Search Results

You are looking at 21 - 30 of 36 items for :

  • "computer navigation" x
Clear All
Babar Kayani University College London Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Babar Kayani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sujith Konan University College London Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Sujith Konan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Atif Ayuob University College London Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Atif Ayuob in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Salamah Ayyad University College London Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Salamah Ayyad in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Fares S. Haddad University College London Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Fares S. Haddad in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

landmarks on a generic model of the pelvis (non-image-based navigation). Computer navigation provides patient-specific anatomical data with recommendations for bone resection and optimal implant positioning, but the computer system does not actively control

Open access
Agnieszka Halm-Pozniak Department of Orthopaedics, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany

Search for other papers by Agnieszka Halm-Pozniak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Christoph H Lohmann Department of Orthopaedics, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Germany

Search for other papers by Christoph H Lohmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Luigi Zagra IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Hip Department, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Luigi Zagra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Benedikt Braun Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery at the Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, BG Unfallklinik Tübingen, Germany

Search for other papers by Benedikt Braun in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Max Gordon Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Unit of Orthopedics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for other papers by Max Gordon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Bernd Grimm Department of Precision Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Human Motion, Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine, Digital Methods, Luxembourg

Search for other papers by Bernd Grimm in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

unproven. Indeed, a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials showed a significant reduction of surgical time of manual total hip arthroplasty in comparison with computer navigation and robotics, and no differences were observed in the incidence

Open access
Michele Vasso Concordia Hospital for Special Surgery, Rome, Italy

Search for other papers by Michele Vasso in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alexander Antoniadis Bürgerspital Solothurn, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Alexander Antoniadis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Naeder Helmy Bürgerspital Solothurn, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Naeder Helmy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

selection, optimal implant positioning might be crucial to reduce the potential for surgical errors. With the use of computer navigation (CAS), it has been shown that the position of the implant can be improved. 63 A study using patient

Open access
Javier Pizones Spine Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by Javier Pizones in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Eduardo García-Rey Hip Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by Eduardo García-Rey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Yoshikawa H Sato Y Tamura S . Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation . J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007 ; 89 : 455 – 460 . 53. Wan Z

Open access
Francesco Benazzo Sezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico – Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, U.O Ortopedia e Traumatologia Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Lombardy, Italy
Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Lombardy, Italy

Search for other papers by Francesco Benazzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Loris Perticarini Sezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico – Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, U.O Ortopedia e Traumatologia Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Lombardy, Italy

Search for other papers by Loris Perticarini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Eugenio Jannelli Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo – Pavia, Lombardy, Italy

Search for other papers by Eugenio Jannelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alessandro Ivone Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo – Pavia, Lombardy, Italy

Search for other papers by Alessandro Ivone in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Matteo Ghiara Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologia, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo – Pavia, Lombardy, Italy

Search for other papers by Matteo Ghiara in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi Sezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico – Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, U.O Ortopedia e Traumatologia Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Lombardy, Italy

Search for other papers by Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

computer navigation, patient’s specific instruments or robotics have been developed in order to optimize patellar resurfacing, which remains a crude procedure and utilizes poor anatomic landmarks. Patient-related issues ‘At risk’ categories Four

Open access
David T. Wallace Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
Department of Orthopaedics, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK

Search for other papers by David T. Wallace in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Philip E. Riches Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK

Search for other papers by Philip E. Riches in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Frédéric Picard Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
Department of Orthopaedics, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Clydebank, UK

Search for other papers by Frédéric Picard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

examination has been assessed using stress radiographs, 10 , 24 isokinetic dynamometry, 2 , 6 non-invasive image free navigation 38 and under anaesthetic using bone-anchored computer navigation. 21 These methods allow a repeatable

Open access
Fahima A. Begum University College Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Fahima A. Begum in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Babar Kayani University College Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Babar Kayani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Samuel D. J. Morgan University College Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Samuel D. J. Morgan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Syed S. Ahmed University College Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Syed S. Ahmed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sandeep Singh University College Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Sandeep Singh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Fares S. Haddad University College Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Fares S. Haddad in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

component designs, minimally invasive surgery, computer-navigation, and patient-specific implants. 26 – 28 The learning curve for robotic UKA is important for understanding the impact of this procedure on the surgical workflow, scheduling of operative

Open access
Anne Lübbeke Division of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland; Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by Anne Lübbeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

proximal femur fractures operated within a certain time frame, or operated upon with use of computer navigation. How to measure the impact of an intervention on outcome This topic has been largely covered by publications and textbooks for the

Open access
Didier Hannouche Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Didier Hannouche in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Matthieu Zingg Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Matthieu Zingg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hermes Miozzari Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Hermes Miozzari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Remy Nizard Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris University, Paris, France

Search for other papers by Remy Nizard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Anne Lübbeke Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Anne Lübbeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty . Orthopedics 2008 ; 31 : 31 . 57 Shah SM Deep K Siramanakul C . Computer navigation helps reduce the incidence of noise after ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty . J

Open access
Pascal-André Vendittoli Personalized Arthroplasty Society
Surgery Department, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal University, Montreal, Québec, Canada
Clinique orthopédique Duval, 1487 Boul des Laurentides, Laval

Search for other papers by Pascal-André Vendittoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Charles Riviere Personalized Arthroplasty Society
Bordeaux Arthroplasty Research Institute - Clinique du Sport Bordeaux-Mérignac 04-06 rue Georges Negrevergne, Mérignac, France

Search for other papers by Charles Riviere in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michael T Hirschmann Personalized Arthroplasty Society
Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Baselland, Bruderholz, Switzerland
Clinical Research Group Michael T. Hirschmann, Regenerative Medicine & Biomechanics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Michael T Hirschmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Stefano Bini Personalized Arthroplasty Society
Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA

Search for other papers by Stefano Bini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

with manual instruments designed specifically for that purpose. Today, we can revisit the assumption. High precision in surgery is now possible due to newer technologies, such as computer navigation, patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), and robotics

Open access