Search for other papers by Maria Moralidou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anna Di Laura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johann Henckel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Harry Hothi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alister J. Hart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
prediction has been proven satisfactory, with good inter-observer variability. 7 – 9 , 11 , 13 , 21 – 28 Prediction rates for femoral stem and acetabular cup sizes range between 34–100% and 41–100% respectively ( Table 3 ). Considering this, 3D pre
Search for other papers by George Grammatopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Moritz Innmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe Phan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Russell Bodner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Geert Meermans in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction Appropriate component orientation is important for success following hip arthroplasty ( 1 ). The significance of appropriate acetabular component (cup) orientation was further highlighted with the use of the third-generation metal
Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Gothenburg, Sweden
Search for other papers by Georgios Tsikandylakis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
Search for other papers by Soren Overgaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luigi Zagra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Gothenburg, Sweden
The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Gothenburg, Sweden
Search for other papers by Johan Kärrholm in
Google Scholar
PubMed
friction and higher wear and loosening rate when articulating against polyethylene cups of contemporary design. 3 In 1990, Livermore and colleagues suggested a compromise which was the use of a 28-mm head, which, for at least a decade, became a
Search for other papers by Julia Riemenschneider in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jan Tilmann Vollrath in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nils Mühlenfeld in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johannes Frank in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ingo Marzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maren Janko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
–Peterson) following ( 34 ). However, a THA is only possible with a standard uncemented or cemented acetabular cup if the containment of the acetabulum is stable enough ( 2 ). If not, this approach is not possible and additional measures are necessary, with additional
Search for other papers by Alessandro Colombi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Daniele Schena in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Claudio Carlo Castelli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
X-ray image due to pelvic tilt following a lumbar arthrodesis. Fig. 3 Same implant and patient, different X-ray angle leading to different evaluation of cup orientation. (a) incorrect beam angle: cup too vertical and anteverted position
Search for other papers by Arya Nicum in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, UK
Search for other papers by Harry Hothi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johann Henckel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, UK
Search for other papers by Anna di Laura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Klaus Schlueter-Brust in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Cleveland Clinic London, London, UK
Search for other papers by Alister Hart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
literature regarding various industries that are successfully implementing this technique, presenting this paper as a resource for those involved in this field going forward. To achieve this, a 3D-printed acetabular cup will be analysed ( Fig. 1 ). This
Search for other papers by Olivier Guyen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
constrained devices has been shown to be design-dependent. Dislocation rates have been reported ranging between 4.5% and 29% with the S-ROM cup. 6 , 7 The tripolar constrained design provided better short-term results with dislocation rates ranging from 2
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
These authors contributed equally to the manuscript
Search for other papers by Zeng Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
These authors contributed equally to the manuscript
Search for other papers by Shuai Xiang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cuijiao Wu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yingzhen Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xisheng Weng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, 2 However, for THA involving a polyethylene (PE) liner, one of the major factors threatening long-term survival is the production of wear particles, resulting in periprosthetic osteolysis and aseptic loosening of the acetabular cup and/or the
Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
Search for other papers by Anne Lübbeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christophe Combescure in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christophe Barea in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Amanda Inez Gonzalez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Keith Tucker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Per Kjærsgaard-Andersen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tom Melvin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alan G Fraser in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rob Nelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
Search for other papers by James A Smith in
Google Scholar
PubMed
obtained lists of hip cups ( n = 138), hip stems ( n = 165), and knee ( n = 97) implants. From that pool of CE-marked implants, ten devices were then randomly selected from each of the three lists. The unit of analysis used was determined for the hip
Academic Unit of Bone Metabolism, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
Search for other papers by Andreas Fontalis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine (CORE), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
Search for other papers by Eustathios Kenanidis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Katharine Bennett-Brown in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre of Orthopaedic and Regenerative Medicine (CORE), Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Innovation (CIRI), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
Search for other papers by Eleftherios Tsiridis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
surgical approach used Study Patients/THA Type of stem Type of cup Femoral head/ bearing couple Approach Wojtowicz et al, 2019 22 Elective THA in PD patients with primary OA ( N = 490) Cemented 442 (90%), Uncemented