Search for other papers by Martin Krismer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
using heads up to 36 mm diameter. Peri-prosthetic fracture In a register study, 27 the rate of periprosthetic fracture was 0.9% five years after primary THA (n = 52 136), and 1.7% after ten years. It is lower in males (0.6% and 1.2%) than
Search for other papers by Maurizio Calcagni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas Giesen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
be found which described attempts at prosthetic replacement. What we define as Type 2 implants are those that partially or completely replace the ulna head only, some of them presenting with features engineered to allow the reattachment of the
Search for other papers by Volkmar Jansson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alexander Grimberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Oliver Melsheimer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Carsten Perka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
German Arthroplasty Registry (EPRD Deutsche Endoprothesenregister gGmbH), Berlin, Germany
Search for other papers by Arnd Steinbrück in
Google Scholar
PubMed
preference in Germany for a ceramic head articulating on highly crosslinked polyethylene in hip arthroplasty. Ceramic heads are utilized in 87.3% of all prosthetic total hip joints ( Table 2 ), which represents a growth of almost 2% since 2014. This high
Search for other papers by Cheuk Yin Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kenneth Jordan Ng Cheong Chung in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Omar M. E. Ali in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicholas D. H. Chung in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Cheuk Heng Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. 99 Cytokines that cause pain primarily include IL-1β. 100 In addition, there is also evidence to suggest direct activation of nociceptor neurons by pathogens themselves. 101 A major cause for prosthetic joint infection is gram
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Izaäk F. Kodde in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jetske Viveen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bertram The in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Roger P. van Riet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other papers by Denise Eygendaal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
. Diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection: cultures, biomarker and criteria . Infect Dis Clin North Am 2017 ; 31 : 219 – 235 . 15. Somerson JS Morrey ME Sanchez-Sotelo J Morrey BF . Diagnosis and management of
Search for other papers by Marco Gupton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jordan E Johnson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G Robert Cummings in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chenthuran Deivaraju in
Google Scholar
PubMed
- and postoperative x-rays or advanced imaging; (iii) TKA performed for osteoarthritis; (iv) reported subjective and/or objective patient outcomes in relation to PFJ overstuffing; (v) patient follow-up of at least 1 year; (vi) prosthetic implant that is
Search for other papers by Xiang-Dong Wu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yixin Zhou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hongyi Shao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dejin Yang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sheng-Jie Guo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wei Huang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
, publication year, country, study design, patient demographics, revision surgery, robotic systems, prosthetic designs, registration techniques, and reported outcomes. Extracted data were entered into a pre-generated standardized Excel (Microsoft Corporation
Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
Search for other papers by David González-Martín in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
Search for other papers by José Luis Pais-Brito in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sergio González-Casamayor in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ayron Guerra-Ferraz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
Search for other papers by Jorge Ojeda-Jiménez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
Search for other papers by Mario Herrera-Pérez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
either non-surgically or surgically, depending on the stability of the fracture; for type B1, the recommended treatment is open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF); for type B2, they recommend prosthetic replacement using a longer stem; type B3
Search for other papers by Michele Vasso in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alexander Antoniadis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Naeder Helmy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
or fixed, progression of the disease or loosening being the most common. Less frequent failures are infection, peri-prosthetic fractures, persistent pain or ankylosis. Between these two groups, there is a major difference: in one, failures are due to
Bucharest Emergency Clinical Hospital, Romania
Search for other papers by Razvan Ene in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Mihai Nica in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bucharest Emergency Clinical Hospital, Romania
Search for other papers by Dragos Ene in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Adrian Cursaru in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Catalin Cirstoiu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
under investigation refers to potential increased wear of the prosthetic joint articular surfaces by the interposition of the material beads and the mechanical abrasion during joint movement. Going back to the basic principles, the main objectives for
