Search for other papers by Andreas Frodl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Benjamin Erdle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Hospital Odense, Dep. Of Orthopedic Surgery, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
Search for other papers by Hagen Schmal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
osteosyntheses were a 3.5 mm locking compression plate (LCP) and 1/3rd tubular plate, respectively. Postoperative follow-ups ranged from 6 to 21 months ( Table 1 ). Risk of bias assessment All included studies possessed an evidence level III. There is a
Search for other papers by Pernille Bovbjerg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ditte Høgh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lonnie Froberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Clinic of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
Search for other papers by Hagen Schmal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Moustapha Kassem in
Google Scholar
PubMed
the two authors. The risk of bias assessment tool RoB 2.0 11 was used for randomized trials. Risk of bias could be reported as low, some concern or high. The ROBNS-I risk of bias assessment tool 12 was used for non-randomized trials and risk
Search for other papers by Marc Beirer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chlodwig Kirchhoff in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Peter Biberthaler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
least 16 years of age with a fracture diagnosed by radiographs, computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are included. Outcome assessment is performed by two patient-based outcome measurement tools: the Euroqol 5 dimensions three
Search for other papers by Andreas Frodl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johannes Hauss in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andreas Fuchs in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Markus Siegel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hagen Schmal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jan Kühle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
: retrospective study. Risk of bias assessment All included studies possessed an evidence level I–III. Surgical techniques were reported in every study, minimizing the risk of operational bias even in cases in which several surgeons were
Search for other papers by Hjalte Søsborg-Würtz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sükriye Corap Gellert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julie Ladeby Erichsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bjarke Viberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
meta-analysis of the current literature that compares closed reduction by MT to FTT with radiographic measures and pain assessment in the treatment of distal radial fractures in adults. Methods Protocol and registration This systematic
These authors contributed equally to this work
Search for other papers by Heri Suroto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Cell & Tissue Bank-Regenerative Medicine Centre, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia
These authors contributed equally to this work
Search for other papers by Brigita De Vega in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fani Deapsari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tabita Prajasari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pramono Ari Wibowo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Steven K. Samijo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
indication of surgery, pre-operative comorbidity, surgical method, follow-up duration, range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder, Constant-Murley score, complications, revision surgery, author conclusion. Risk of bias assessment For randomized controlled
Search for other papers by Simon M. Lambert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Introduction The functional outcome of a proximal humeral fracture (PHF) is never that of a completely normal shoulder, however treated. Management of PHF, as for all fractures, combines an assessment of the mechanical and biological factors
Search for other papers by Paul Hoogervorst in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Peter van Schie in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michel PJ van den Bekerom in
Google Scholar
PubMed
regarding the management of these fractures. In this article, both conservative and operative treatment and the current concepts will be discussed, based on the available evidence. Physical examination and radiological assessment During physical
Hand Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Search for other papers by Andrea Fidanza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefano Necozione in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
Search for other papers by Lorenzo Garagnani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
good pain relief and preserve wrist movement, but the authors noted within the study's limitations that they categorised all types of partial wrist denervations as a unique procedure, without performing separate assessments of the different partial
Search for other papers by Haroon Majeed in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Donald J. McBride in
Google Scholar
PubMed
% potentially requiring a subtalar fusion. 8 , 11 In Hawkins type II fractures, an arthroscopic assessment is recommended and, depending on the chondral damage and size of the comminuted fragments, arthroscopic debridement is considered the most suitable
