Search Results
Search for other papers by Michele Boffano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefano Mortera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Raimondo Piana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
Shoulder joint dislocation is the most common joint dislocation seen in the emergency department.
-
Traumatic dislocation may cause damage to the soft-tissues surrounding the shoulder joint and sometimes to the bone. The treatment, which aims at restoration of a fully functioning, pain-free and stable shoulder, includes either conservative or surgical management preceded by closed reduction of the acute dislocation.
-
Conservative management usually requires a period of rest, generally involving immobilisation of the arm in a sling, even though it is still debated whether to immobilise the shoulder in internal or external rotation.
-
Operative management, with no significant differences in term of re-dislocation rates between open and arthroscopic repair, incorporates soft-tissue reconstructions and/or bony procedures and is recommended in young male adults engaged in highly demanding physical activities.
-
At our institution, non-operative management is favoured particularly for patients with multi-directional instability or soft-tissue laxity. Conservative measures are often preferred in older patients or younger patients that are not actively engaged in overhead activities. Immediate surgery on all first-time dislocations may subject many patients to surgery who would not have had any future subluxation.
-
For these reasons, initially we will always try physical therapy and activity modification for the vast majority of our patients.
Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:35-40.DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160018.
Search for other papers by Michele Boffano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefano Mortera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hazem Wafa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Raimondo Piana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries are common, but their incidence is probably underestimated. As the treatment of some sub-types is still debated, we reviewed the available literature to obtain an overview of current management.
-
We analysed the literature using the PubMed search engine.
-
There is consensus on the treatment of Rockwood type I and type II lesions and for high-grade injuries of types IV, V and VI. The treatment of type III injuries remains controversial, as none of the studies has proven a significant benefit of one procedure when compared with another.
-
Several approaches can be considered in reaching a valid solution for treating ACJ lesions. The final outcome is affected by both vertical and horizontal post-operative ACJ stability. Synthetic devices, positioned using early open or arthroscopic procedures, are the main choice for young people.
-
Type III injuries should be managed surgically only in cases with high-demand sporting or working activities.
Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:432–437. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160085.