Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 5 of 5 items for

  • Author: Sammy A. Hanna x
Clear All Modify Search
David Lin Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Royal London Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by David Lin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alexander Charalambous Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Royal London Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Alexander Charalambous in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Sammy A. Hanna Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Royal London Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Sammy A. Hanna in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) can commonly involve the hip joint and cause significant mobility problems. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) on a single side alone will not restore mobility in patients with bilateral disease.

  • We performed a systematic review of the available literature to determine the changes in objective outcome measures and complications of bilateral THA in patients with advanced AS. Four studies, a total of 114 THAs, were included in the study. The average patient age was 32.9 years and the average follow-up time was 59.5 months.

  • All studies reported a significant improvement in hip function, patient satisfaction and patient mobility following bilateral THA. Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved by a mean of 60.6 points post-operatively.

  • Complications included five intra-operative fractures (4.4%) and three transient nerve palsies (2.6%). There were two dislocations (1.8%) that were successfully managed with closed reduction. Seven hips required revision, with the most common cause being aseptic loosening. Twelve hips (10.5%) developed heterotopic ossification consistent with Brooker Class 1 or 2 with no reports of re-ankylosis.

  • This review suggests that bilateral THA is a safe and effective treatment of advanced hip disease in AS. Attention must be paid to the highly demanding technical aspects of this procedure to reduce the risk of significant complications.

  • Debate still exists on the ideal prosthesis, fixation method and approach to use but this review presents data from several series of uncemented prostheses that have good post-operative results.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:476-481. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180047

Open access
Matthew Barrett Barts and the London School of Medicine & Dentistry, UK

Search for other papers by Matthew Barrett in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Anoop Prasad Department of Orthopaedics, Royal London Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Anoop Prasad in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Louis Boyce Barts and the London School of Medicine & Dentistry, UK

Search for other papers by Louis Boyce in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sebastian Dawson-Bowling Department of Orthopaedics, Royal London Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Sebastian Dawson-Bowling in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pramod Achan Department of Orthopaedics, Royal London Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Pramod Achan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Steven Millington Department of Orthopaedics, Royal London Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Steven Millington in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Sammy A. Hanna Department of Orthopaedics, Royal London Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Sammy A. Hanna in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • The increasing prevalence of obesity has resulted in a marked increase in the number of total hip arthroplasties (THAs) carried out in patients with a high body mass index (BMI).

  • THA in morbidly obese patients is often technically challenging owing to the associated co-morbidities and anatomical factors. Furthermore, the long-term clinical and functional outcomes of the procedure in these patients are not clear.

  • The aim of this systematic review was to compare the long-term failure rate and functional outcomes of THA in morbidly obese versus non-obese patients.

  • A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE and PubMed Central was conducted to identify studies that compared the outcomes of THA in patients defined as morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 35) to a control group (BMI < 30). The primary and secondary outcome measures were rate of revision and functional outcome, respectively, in the long term.

  • Eight studies were included in this review. There were 66,238 THAs in morbidly obese patients and 705,619 THAs in patients with a BMI < 30. The overall revision rate was 7.99% in the morbidly obese patients versus 2.75% in the non-obese controls. The functional outcome was at least comparable to non-obese patients.

  • This review suggests that morbidly obese patients have a slightly increased revision rate following THA. Importantly, these patients have a functional recovery at least comparable to those with a BMI < 30. Morbidly obese patients should be fully informed of these issues prior to undergoing surgery.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:507-512. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180011

Open access
Anoop Prasad Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Royal London Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Anoop Prasad in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Richard Donovan Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Royal London Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Richard Donovan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Manoj Ramachandran Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Royal London Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Manoj Ramachandran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sebastian Dawson-Bowling Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Royal London Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Sebastian Dawson-Bowling in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Steven Millington Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Royal London Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Steven Millington in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rej Bhumbra Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Royal London Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Rej Bhumbra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pramod Achan Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Royal London Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Pramod Achan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Sammy A. Hanna Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Royal London Hospital, UK

Search for other papers by Sammy A. Hanna in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients affected by poliomyelitis is technically challenging owing to abnormal anatomical features including articular and metaphyseal angular deformities, external rotation of the tibia, excessive valgus alignment, bone loss, narrowness of the femoral and tibial canals, impaired quadriceps strength, flexion contractures, genu recurvatum and ligamentous laxity. Little information is available regarding the results and complications of TKA in this challenging group of patients.

  • We carried out a systematic review of the literature to determine the functional outcome, complications and revision rates of TKA in patients with poliomyelitis-affected knees. Six studies including 82 knees met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. The mean patient age was 63 years (45 to 85) and follow-up was 5.5 years (0.5 to 13).

  • All studies reported significant improvement in knee function following TKA. There were six failures requiring revision surgery in 82 cases (7%) occurring at a mean of 6.2 years (0.4 to 12). The reasons for revision surgery were aseptic loosening (17%, n=1), infection (33%, n=2), periprosthetic fracture (17%, n=1) and instability (33%, n=2). Thirty-six knees had a degree of recurvatum pre-operatively (44%), which was in the range of 5° to 30°. Ten of these knees (28%) developed recurrent recurvatum post-operatively.

  • The findings support the use of TKA in patients with poliomyelitis-affected knees. The post-operative functional outcome is similar to other patients; however, the revision rate is higher. Quadriceps muscle power appears to be an important prognostic factor for functional outcome and the use of constrained implant designs is recommended in the presence of less than antigravity quadriceps strength.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:358-362. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170028

Open access
Anoop K. Prasad Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Anoop K. Prasad in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jaimee H.S. Tan Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for other papers by Jaimee H.S. Tan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hany S. Bedair Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Kaplan Joint Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts, USA

Search for other papers by Hany S. Bedair in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sebastian Dawson-Bowling Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Sebastian Dawson-Bowling in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Sammy A. Hanna Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Sammy A. Hanna in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Over 100,000 total knee replacements (TKRs) are carried out in the UK annually, with cemented fixation accounting for approximately 95% of all primary TKRs. In Australia, 68.1% of all primary TKRs use cemented fixation, and only 10.9% use cementless fixation. However, there has been a renewed interest in cementless fixation as a result of improvements in implant design and manufacturing technology.

  • This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of cemented and cementless fixation in primary TKR. Outcome measures included the revision rate and patient-reported functional scores.

  • MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from the earliest available date to November 2018 for randomized controlled trials of primary TKAs comparing cemented versus cementless fixation outcomes.

  • Six studies met our inclusion criteria and were analysed. A total of 755 knees were included; 356 knees underwent cemented fixation, 399 underwent cementless fixation. They were followed up for an average of 8.4 years (range: 2.0 to 16.6).

  • This study found no significant difference in revision rates and knee function in cemented versus cementless TKR at up to 16.6-year follow-up.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:793-798. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200030

Open access
Khaled M. Sarraf St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Khaled M. Sarraf in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ravi Popat St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Ravi Popat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kathryn L. Kneale St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Kathryn L. Kneale in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rajarshi Bhattacharya St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Rajarshi Bhattacharya in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Manoj Ramachandran The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Manoj Ramachandran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pramod Achan The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Pramod Achan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Sammy A. Hanna The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Sammy A. Hanna in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Background: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) results in alterations to femoral head anatomy, predisposing patients to degenerative hip disease at a young age. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is performed to relieve symptoms and improve function. However, it can be associated with a variable outcomes and little evidence exists on the functional outcomes, complications and revision rate following such procedures.

  • Purpose: The aim of this systematic review is to determine the safety and effectiveness of performing hip arthroplasty in patients with degenerative hips secondary to SCFE.

  • Methodology: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A literature review was conducted of MEDLINE and Embase. Both single-arm and comparative studies were included. The outcomes of interest were functional scores, post-operative complications and revision rate.

  • Results: Six studies fit the inclusion criteria. Of these, five were retrospective single-arm studies and one was a retrospective comparative study based on registry data.

  • All studies reported significant improvement in hip function and quality of life after THA. An overall revision rate of 11.9% was reported, occurring at a mean of 6.5 years (0.75–18.7 years).

  • THA in patients after SCFE leads to improved functional outcomes that are comparable to patients receiving THA for osteoarthritis. The revision rate appears to be higher than is reported in patients undergoing THA for osteoarthritis at mid-term follow-up. Further prospective comparative studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment in more detail.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:539-544. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200038

Open access