Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for

  • Author: Pieter Caekebeke x
Clear All Modify Search
Pieter Caekebeke Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Department of Orthopaedics Surgery and Traumatology, Genk, Belgium

Search for other papers by Pieter Caekebeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joris Duerinckx Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Department of Orthopaedics Surgery and Traumatology, Genk, Belgium

Search for other papers by Joris Duerinckx in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Roger van Riet AZ Monica, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Antwerp, Belgium
University Hospital Antwerp, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Edegem, Belgium

Search for other papers by Roger van Riet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Acute distal biceps tendon (DBT) pathology includes bicipitoradial bursitis, tendinosis, partial and complete tears.

  • Diagnosis of complete DBT tears is mainly clinical, whereas in partial tears medical imaging is a valuable addition to the clinical diagnosis.

  • New insights in clinical and medical imaging of partial tears may reduce time to diagnosis and may guide the treatment plan.

  • Most complete tears are best treated with primary repair using either a single-incision or double-incision approach with good clinical outcome.

  • The double-incision technique has a higher risk of heterotopic ossification, whereas a single-incision technique carries a higher risk of nerve-related complications.

  • Intramedullary fixation may be a viable solution to negate the risk of posterior interosseus nerve lesions in single-incision repairs.

  • DBT endoscopy can be used to treat low-grade partial tears and tendinosis.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:956-965. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200145

Open access
Megan Conti Mica University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Department of Orthopedics, AZ Monica, Deurne, Belgium
Department of Orthopedics, AZ Monica, Deurne, and University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium

Search for other papers by Megan Conti Mica in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pieter Caekebeke University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Department of Orthopedics, AZ Monica, Deurne, Belgium
Department of Orthopedics, AZ Monica, Deurne, and University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium

Search for other papers by Pieter Caekebeke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Roger van Riet University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Department of Orthopedics, AZ Monica, Deurne, Belgium
Department of Orthopedics, AZ Monica, Deurne, and University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium

Search for other papers by Roger van Riet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Chronic posterolateral rotatory instability (PLRI) is the most common form of chronic elbow instability.

  • PLRI usually occurs from a fall on the outstretched hand. On impact, the radial head and ulna rotate externally coupled with valgus displacement of the forearm. This leads to posterior displacement of the radial head relative to the capitellum, thus causing disruption of some or all of the lateral-sided stabilisers.

  • PLRI is mainly a clinical diagnosis with a history of instability, clicking and lateral-sided pain, with a positive clinical examination including the pivot-shift test, push-up, chair and tabletop test.

  • MRI can often help guide diagnosis but more commonly assists in surgical planning.

  • Surgery is indicated in patients with persistent, symptomatic instability of the elbow causing pain or functional deficit. There are several surgical techniques to treat PLRI, often leading to good to excellent results.

  • An open or arthroscopic technique has been successfully used in patients with symptomatic PLRI following one or more episodes of dislocation or subluxation. At the pre-operative examination under general anaesthesia, all of our patients had a positive pivot-shift test but not a frank dislocation. We prefer to perform a lateral collateral ligament (LCL) reconstruction with an allograft tendon.

  • The outcomes after repair are good to excellent in the majority of patients. Results of acute repair are generally better compared with reconstruction. This is due to the fact that predictive factors for a poor outcome include the number of previous surgeries and the prevalence of degenerative changes at the elbow.

  • Recurrent instability is not uncommon following repair or reconstruction and has been reported in up to 25% of patients after medium- to longer-term follow-up.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:461-468. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.160033

Open access