Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for

  • Author: Peter H. Richter x
Clear All Modify Search
Peter H. Richter Orthopaedic Trauma Department, Universität Ulm, Germany

Search for other papers by Peter H. Richter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Florian Gebhard Orthopaedic Trauma Department, Universität Ulm, Germany

Search for other papers by Florian Gebhard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alexander Eickhoff Orthopaedic Trauma Department, Universität Ulm, Germany

Search for other papers by Alexander Eickhoff in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Konrad Schütze Orthopaedic Trauma Department, Universität Ulm, Germany

Search for other papers by Konrad Schütze in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • The invention of flat-panel detectors led to a revolution in medical imaging. The major benefits of this technology are a higher image quality and dose reduction. Flat-panel detectors have proved to be superior to standard C-arms (= C-arm with radiograph source and image intensifier).

  • Cone-beam computed tomography (cone-beam CT) is a 3D data set, which can be acquired with a flat-panel detector. The cone-shaped beam is used for 3D data generation. For cone-beam CT acquisition, the flat-panel detector rotates around the patient lying on the operating table. Intra-operative cone-beam CT can be a very helpful tool in orthopaedic surgery. Immediate control of fracture reduction and implant positioning in high image quality can reduce the need for secondary revision surgery due to implant malposition.

  • In recent years there has been a revival of standard fan beam CT technology in operating rooms. Fixed and mobile systems are available. Fixed systems are typically placed on a sliding gantry. Different mobile intra-operative CT scanners were recently introduced. Due to their mobility, they are not bound to a specific operating room. The use of standard intra-operative CT scanners results in high 3D image quality but, in comparison with a cone-beam CT scanner, fluoroscopy is not possible.

  • The introduction of flat-panel detectors has led to improvements in intra-operative image quality combined with dose reduction. The possibility of high-quality 3D imaging in combination with navigation can assure optimal implant placement. Due to immediate control of the osteosynthesis, revision surgery at a later time can be prevented.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170055

Open access
Benedikt J. Braun Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Saarland University Hospital, Germany

Search for other papers by Benedikt J. Braun in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Bernd Grimm Luxembourg Institute of Health, Luxembourg

Search for other papers by Bernd Grimm in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Andrew M. Hanflik Los Alamitos Orthopaedics, Los Alamitos, California, USA

Search for other papers by Andrew M. Hanflik in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Meir T. Marmor Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA

Search for other papers by Meir T. Marmor in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Peter H. Richter Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Saarland University Hospital, Germany

Search for other papers by Peter H. Richter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Andrew K. Sands Weill Cornell Medical College, Foot and Ankle Surgery, Downtown Orthopedic Associates, New York Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital, New York, USA

Search for other papers by Andrew K. Sands in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Sureshan Sivananthan Orthopaedic Surgery, Pantai Hospital Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Search for other papers by Sureshan Sivananthan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • There are many digital solutions which assist the orthopaedic trauma surgeon. This already broad field is rapidly expanding, making a complete overview of the existing solutions difficult.

  • The AO Foundation has established a task force to address the need for an overview of digital solutions in the field of orthopaedic trauma surgery.

  • Areas of new technology which will help the surgeon gain a greater understanding of these possible solutions are reviewed.

  • We propose a categorization of the current needs in orthopaedic trauma surgery matched with available or potential digital solutions, and provide a narrative overview of this broad topic, including the needs, solutions and basic rules to ensure adequate use in orthopaedic trauma surgery. We seek to make this field more accessible, allowing for technological solutions to be clearly matched to trauma surgeons’ needs.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:408-420. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200021

Open access