Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 3 of 3 items for

  • Author: Morten Schultz Larsen x
Clear All Modify Search
Morten Schultz Larsen Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark

Search for other papers by Morten Schultz Larsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Hagen Schmal Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark

Search for other papers by Hagen Schmal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Atypical femoral fractures (AFF) are stress or ‘insufficiency’ fractures, often complicated by the use of bisphosphonates or other bone turnover inhibitors. While these drugs are beneficial for the intact osteoporotic bone, they probably prevent a stress fracture from healing which thus progresses to a complete fracture.

  • Key features of atypical femoral fractures, essential for the diagnosis, are: location in the subtrochanteric region and diaphysis; lack of trauma history and comminution; and a transverse or short oblique configuration.

  • The relative risk of patients developing an atypical femoral fracture when taking bisphosphonates is high; however, the absolute risk of these fractures in patients on bisphosphonates is low, ranging from 3.2 to 50 cases per 100,000 person-years.

  • Treatment strategy in patients with AFF involves: radiograph of the contralateral side (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging should also be considered); dietary calcium and vitamin D supplementation should be prescribed following assessment; bisphosphonates or other potent antiresorptive agents should be discontinued; prophylactic surgical treatment of incomplete AFF with cephalomedullary nail, unless pain free; cephalomedullary nailing for surgical fixation of complete fractures; avoidance of gaps in the lateral and anterior cortex; avoidance of varus malreduction.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:494-500. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170070.

Open access
Lars Henrik Frich Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark

Search for other papers by Lars Henrik Frich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Morten Schultz Larsen Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark

Search for other papers by Morten Schultz Larsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • The glenoid fossa is involved in approximately 10% of all scapular fractures.

  • Glenoid fossa incongruity is surprisingly well tolerated.

  • Surgery is recommended when 20% or more of the anterior glenoid fossa is involved.

  • Glenoid rim fractures often lead to chronic shoulder instability.

  • Unstable glenoid neck fractures need surgical treatment and stable fractures can be treated conservatively.

  • CT examination with 3D reformations of the glenoid fossa has improved insight into fracture morphology and fracture patterns and is very helpful for clinical decision makers.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160082. Originally published online at www.efortopenreviews.org

Open access
Josep Muñoz Vives Hospital Nostra Senyora de Meritxell, Andorra, Spain

Search for other papers by Josep Muñoz Vives in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jean-Christophe Bel Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France

Search for other papers by Jean-Christophe Bel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Arantxa Capel Agundez Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by Arantxa Capel Agundez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Francisco Chana Rodríguez Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain

Search for other papers by Francisco Chana Rodríguez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
José Palomo Traver Hospital General de Castelló, Castelló de la Plana, Spain

Search for other papers by José Palomo Traver in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Morten Schultz-Larsen Odense Universitetshospita, Odense, Denmark

Search for other papers by Morten Schultz-Larsen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Theodoros Tosounidis Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK

Search for other papers by Theodoros Tosounidis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • In 1975, Blake and McBryde established the concept of ‘floating knee’ to describe ipsilateral fractures of the femur and tibia.1 This combination is much more than a bone lesion; the mechanism is usually a high-energy trauma in a patient with multiple injuries and a myriad of other lesions.

  • After initial evaluation patients should be categorised, and only stable patients should undergo immediate reduction and internal fixation with the rest receiving external fixation.

  • Definitive internal fixation of both bones yields the best results in almost all series.

  • Nailing of both bones is the optimal fixation when both fractures (femoral and tibial) are extra-articular.

  • Plates are the ‘standard of care’ in cases with articular fractures.

  • A combination of implants are required by 40% of floating knees.

  • Associated ligamentous and meniscal lesions are common, but may be irrelevant in the case of an intra-articular fracture which gives the worst prognosis for this type of lesion.

Cite this article: Muñoz Vives K, Bel J-C, Capel Agundez A, Chana Rodríguez F, Palomo Traver J, Schultz-Larsen M, Tosounidis, T. The floating knee. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:375-382. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000042.

Open access