Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for

  • Author: Michele Boffano x
Clear All Modify Search
Michele Boffano Oncology and Reconstructive Department, CTO Hospital, AOU Citta’ della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy

Search for other papers by Michele Boffano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stefano Mortera Oncology and Reconstructive Department, CTO Hospital, AOU Citta’ della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy

Search for other papers by Stefano Mortera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Raimondo Piana Oncology and Reconstructive Department, CTO Hospital, AOU Citta’ della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy

Search for other papers by Raimondo Piana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Shoulder joint dislocation is the most common joint dislocation seen in the emergency department.

  • Traumatic dislocation may cause damage to the soft-tissues surrounding the shoulder joint and sometimes to the bone. The treatment, which aims at restoration of a fully functioning, pain-free and stable shoulder, includes either conservative or surgical management preceded by closed reduction of the acute dislocation.

  • Conservative management usually requires a period of rest, generally involving immobilisation of the arm in a sling, even though it is still debated whether to immobilise the shoulder in internal or external rotation.

  • Operative management, with no significant differences in term of re-dislocation rates between open and arthroscopic repair, incorporates soft-tissue reconstructions and/or bony procedures and is recommended in young male adults engaged in highly demanding physical activities.

  • At our institution, non-operative management is favoured particularly for patients with multi-directional instability or soft-tissue laxity. Conservative measures are often preferred in older patients or younger patients that are not actively engaged in overhead activities. Immediate surgery on all first-time dislocations may subject many patients to surgery who would not have had any future subluxation.

  • For these reasons, initially we will always try physical therapy and activity modification for the vast majority of our patients.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:35-40.DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160018.

Open access
Michele Boffano CTO Hospital Turin, Italy

Search for other papers by Michele Boffano in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stefano Mortera CTO Hospital Turin, Italy

Search for other papers by Stefano Mortera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hazem Wafa Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK

Search for other papers by Hazem Wafa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Raimondo Piana CTO Hospital Turin, Italy

Search for other papers by Raimondo Piana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries are common, but their incidence is probably underestimated. As the treatment of some sub-types is still debated, we reviewed the available literature to obtain an overview of current management.

  • We analysed the literature using the PubMed search engine.

  • There is consensus on the treatment of Rockwood type I and type II lesions and for high-grade injuries of types IV, V and VI. The treatment of type III injuries remains controversial, as none of the studies has proven a significant benefit of one procedure when compared with another.

  • Several approaches can be considered in reaching a valid solution for treating ACJ lesions. The final outcome is affected by both vertical and horizontal post-operative ACJ stability. Synthetic devices, positioned using early open or arthroscopic procedures, are the main choice for young people.

  • Type III injuries should be managed surgically only in cases with high-demand sporting or working activities.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:432–437. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160085.

Open access