Search Results
Search for other papers by Maurilio Marcacci in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luca Andriolo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elizaveta Kon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nogah Shabshin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giuseppe Filardo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
Bone marrow lesions (BML) of the knee are a frequent MRI finding, present in many different pathologies including trauma, post-cartilage surgery, osteoarthritis, transient BML syndromes, spontaneous insufficiency fractures, and true osteonecrosis.
-
Osteonecrosis (ON) is in turn divided into spontaneous osteonecrosis (SONK), which is considered to be correlated to subchondral insufficiency fractures (SIFK), and avascular necrosis (AVN) which is mainly ascribable to ischaemic events.
-
Every condition has a MRI pattern, a different clinical presentation, and specific histological features which are important in the differential diagnosis.
-
The current evidence supports an overall correlation between BML and patient symptoms, although literature findings are variable, and very little is known about the natural history and the progression of these lesions.
-
A full understanding of BML will be mandatory in the future to better address the different pathologies and develop appropriately-targeted treatments.
Cite this article: Marcacci M, Andriolo L, Kon E, Shabshin N, Filardo G. Aetiology and pathogenesis of bone marrow lesions and osteonecrosis of the knee. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:219-224. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000044.
Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Tommaso Bonanzinga in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matteo Carlo Ferrari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Piergiuseppe Tanzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Filippo Vandenbulcke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Akos Zahar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Maurilio Marcacci in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) management is not standardized worldwide and the outcome is frequently unsatisfactory.
-
More and more arthroplasties are now being performed. An increasing number of highly virulent and antibiotic-resistant bacteria and an ageing population of patients presenting with many comorbidities make it necessary to focus on this important topic.
-
Diagnosis of PJI remains challenging because the clinical signs and symptoms and elevation of systemic biomarkers (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate) may be unclear.
-
In the last few years, the clinical research has focused on synovial fluid biomarkers as a possible breakthrough in the complex scenario of PJI diagnosis.
-
Synovial biomarkers have shown encouraging results and they should be used as diagnostic adjuncts to synovial white cell count and culture bacteriology. Synovial leukocyte esterase (LE) and synovial C-reactive protein (CRP) have been evaluated as good screening measures; however, the most promising synovial fluid biomarker in terms of sensitivity and specificity for PJI seems to be alpha defensin (AD).
-
The laboratory-based alpha defensin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test demonstrated the highest ever reported accuracy for PJI diagnosis. However, an alpha defensin lateral flow test could have its place in ruling in a suspected PJI intraoperatively because of its high specificity and rapid results.
Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:10-13. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180029