Search Results
Search for other papers by Søren Overgaard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Phillippe Neyret in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Klaus-Peter Günther in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Li Felländer-Tsai in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:519-521. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200300
School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, Mezourlo Region, Larissa, Hellenic Republic
Search for other papers by Theofilos Karachalios in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
Search for other papers by Katre Maasalu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Orthopaedics, Reconstructive Orthopaedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Search for other papers by Li Felländer-Tsai in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
Orthopaedic and trauma surgeons performing surgery in the COVID-19 pandemic environment faced problems with availability, use, rationing, modification, compliance and recycling of personal protection equipment (PPE).
-
Orthopaedic and trauma surgeons were not well informed concerning the use of PPE for aerosol-generating orthopaedic and trauma procedures.
-
Scientific bodies, health authorities and management have provided insufficient guidelines for the use of PPE in aerosol-generating orthopaedic and trauma procedures.
-
The availability of specific PPE for orthopaedic and trauma operating theatres is low.
-
Hospital management and surgeons failed to address the quality of operating theatre ventilation or to conform to recommendations and guidelines.
-
Operating theatre PPE negatively affected surgical performance by means of impaired vision, impaired communication, discomfort and fatigue.
-
Existing PPE is not adequately designed for orthopaedic and trauma surgery, and therefore, novel or modified and improved devices are needed.
