Search Results
Search for other papers by Toni Luokkala in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Minna K. Laitinen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
Search for other papers by Teemu P. Hevonkorpi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lauri Raittio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Tampere University Hospital, Finland
Search for other papers by Ville M. Mattila in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antti P. Launonen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
We found no clear evidence of the clinical superiority of distal radius fracture surgery among older adults at one year.
-
Surgical treatment, however, may yield a faster recovery to previous level of activity in elderly patients.
-
With operative treatment, hardware-based problems may warrant secondary operations and implant removal, whereas in non-operative treatment, symptomatic loss of alignment and malunion can occur.
-
In elderly patients, non-operative treatment can be considered to be the gold standard.
Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:361-370. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190060