Print
Save
Email this link

Share Link

Copy this link, or click below to email it to a friend
Email this link
or copy the link directly:

https://eor.bioscientifica.com/search?f_0=author&q_0=Jaimee+H.S.+Tan
The link was not copied. Your current browser may not support copying via this button.

Link copied successfully

Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for

Author: Jaimee H.S. Tan x

Clear All Modify Search

Cemented vs. cementless fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Anoop K. Prasad

Anoop K. Prasad Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Anoop K. Prasad in
Google Scholar
PubMed

Jaimee H.S. Tan

Jaimee H.S. Tan Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for other papers by Jaimee H.S. Tan in
Google Scholar
PubMed

Hany S. Bedair

Hany S. Bedair Department of Orthopaedics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Kaplan Joint Center, Department of Orthopaedics, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, Massachusetts, USA

Search for other papers by Hany S. Bedair in
Google Scholar
PubMed

Sebastian Dawson-Bowling

Sebastian Dawson-Bowling Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Sebastian Dawson-Bowling in
Google Scholar
PubMed

, and

Sammy A. Hanna

Sammy A. Hanna Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Sammy A. Hanna in
Google Scholar
PubMed

Over 100,000 total knee replacements (TKRs) are carried out in the UK annually, with cemented fixation accounting for approximately 95% of all primary TKRs. In Australia, 68.1% of all primary TKRs use cemented fixation, and only 10.9% use cementless fixation. However, there has been a renewed interest in cementless fixation as a result of improvements in implant design and manufacturing technology.
This meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of cemented and cementless fixation in primary TKR. Outcome measures included the revision rate and patient-reported functional scores.
MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from the earliest available date to November 2018 for randomized controlled trials of primary TKAs comparing cemented versus cementless fixation outcomes.
Six studies met our inclusion criteria and were analysed. A total of 755 knees were included; 356 knees underwent cemented fixation, 399 underwent cementless fixation. They were followed up for an average of 8.4 years (range: 2.0 to 16.6).
This study found no significant difference in revision rates and knee function in cemented versus cementless TKR at up to 16.6-year follow-up.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:793-798. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200030