Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for

  • Author: Ion-Andrei Popescu x
Clear All Modify Search
Hubert Laprus St Luke’s Hospital, Bielsko-Biala, Poland
Dworska Hospital, Kraków, Poland
Hospital in Proszowice, Poland

Search for other papers by Hubert Laprus in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Bartłomiej Juszczak University Children’s Hospital in Kraków, Poland

Search for other papers by Bartłomiej Juszczak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Roman Brzóska St Luke’s Hospital, Bielsko-Biala, Poland

Search for other papers by Roman Brzóska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Adrian Błasiak St Luke’s Hospital, Bielsko-Biala, Poland

Search for other papers by Adrian Błasiak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ion-Andrei Popescu Romanian Shoulder Institute -ORTOPEDICUM, Bucharest, Romania

Search for other papers by Ion-Andrei Popescu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Przemysław Lubiatowski Rehasport Clinic, Poznań, Poland

Search for other papers by Przemysław Lubiatowski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Rotator cuff tears (RCT) and instability are the most common surgically treated shoulder pathologies.

  • The concept of augmentation using the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) autograft was created to improve the results of surgical treatment of these pathologies, especially in cases of chronic and massive injuries.

  • The popularity of using the LHBT for augmentation is evidenced by the significant number of publications on this topic published in the last 3 years; however, only one systematic review has been published regarding only LHBT augmentation for massive RCTs.

  • Several studies comparing partial repair with partial repair and additional LHBT augmentation for RCT showed superior clinical outcomes and lower re-tear rates when LHBT augmentation was performed.

  • There is a rising popularity of using LHBT as an autograft to perform superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) in case of irreparable rotator cuff tears.

  • In recent years, shoulder stabilization by arthroscopic Bankart repair with biceps augmentation has been promoted with very promising short-term results.

  • The evidence provided by studies appears to be sufficient to recommend the use of LHBT for augmentation whenever necessary; however, larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed.

Open access
George Mihai Avram Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Central Military Emergency Hospital Dr. Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania

Search for other papers by George Mihai Avram in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Aleksandra Królikowska Physiotherapy Research Laboratory, University Centre of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw University, Wroclaw, Poland

Search for other papers by Aleksandra Królikowska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Berte Bøe Division of Orthopedics Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Norway

Search for other papers by Berte Bøe in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Paweł Reichert Department of Orthopedics, Traumatology and Hand Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland

Search for other papers by Paweł Reichert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ion-Andrei Popescu Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Clinic, ORTOPEDICUM, Bucharest, Romania

Search for other papers by Ion-Andrei Popescu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Roland Becker Center of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg a.d.H., Germany
Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg a.d.H., Germany

Search for other papers by Roland Becker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Robert Prill Center of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Brandenburg/Havel, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg a.d.H., Germany
Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg a.d.H., Germany

Search for other papers by Robert Prill in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purpose

  • The purpose of the present scoping review is to identify sources of heterogeneity in reporting domains that have the potential to improve surgical decision-making in reverse shoulder arthroplasty associated with glenoid bone grafting.

Methods

  • A scoping review was conducted according to the JBI and PRISMA ScR guidelines. Articles covering glenoid bone grafting at the time of reverse shoulder replacement, published between 2012 and 2022 in MEDLINE, Scopus, Epistemonikos, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, were searched. Reporting of core outcome measures, as well as prosthesis-related variables, rehabilitation protocols, radiographic evaluation methods, and bone graft incorporation assessments, were collected.

Results

  • For the final analysis, a total of 14 articles were considered. There were 649 operated shoulders with a mean patient age of 72 years, ranging from 48 to 85 years. Analysis of preoperative ranges of motion and patient-reported outcome measures revealed increased heterogeneity in patient selection between studies. Reporting of implant-related parameters was the most inconsistent. Rehabilitation protocols were scarcely reported. Assessment of graft incorporation and radiographic evaluation of choice revealed that there is no consistent method or measurement and the clinical relevance of radiolucent lines at the graft-glenoid bone interface is unclear.

Conclusion

  • Addressing implant-related reporting gaps has the highest potential to improve surgical decision-making and provide orthopedic surgeons with a more comprehensive understanding of published results on glenoid bone grafting at the time of primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Open access