Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for

  • Author: Hao-nan Liu x
Clear All Modify Search
Wen-xi Sun Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China

Search for other papers by Wen-xi Sun in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hao-nan Liu Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China

Search for other papers by Hao-nan Liu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Meng-tong Chen Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China

Search for other papers by Meng-tong Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yong-peng Lin Division of Spine Center, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China

Search for other papers by Yong-peng Lin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hong-shen Wang Division of Spine Center, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China

Search for other papers by Hong-shen Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Bo-lai Chen Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
Division of Spine Center, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China

Search for other papers by Bo-lai Chen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Objective

  • The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy of oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis by meta-analysis.

Methods

  • A computer-based search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection databases, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine, and Wanfang Digital Periodicals was conducted from the time of inception of each database to December 2021. The review process was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO database. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software provided by the Cochrane Library.

Results

  • Thirteen studies were included in the statistical analysis. One randomized controlled study and 12 cohort studies with 954 patients were included. In terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, Oswestry disability index score, intervertebral height, and complications, the OLIF group was better than the TLIF group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of visual analogue scale score, lumbar lordosis or fused segment lordosis (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

  • Both OLIF and TLIF are effective surgical modalities in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. They achieve similar therapeutic effects, but OLIF is superior to TLIF in restoring intervertebral height. At the same time, OLIF has the advantages of short operation time and less intraoperative blood loss.

Open access