Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for

  • Author: Gino M.M.J. Kerkhoffs x
Clear All Modify Search
Sheryl de Waard Specialized Centre of Othopedic Research & Education (SCORE) and Xpert Orthopedie, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Amsterdam, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Sheryl de Waard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jacqueline van der Vis Specialized Centre of Othopedic Research & Education (SCORE) and Xpert Orthopedie, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Jacqueline van der Vis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pascale A.H.T. Venema Specialized Centre of Othopedic Research & Education (SCORE) and Xpert Orthopedie, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Pascale A.H.T. Venema in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Inger N. Sierevelt Specialized Centre of Othopedic Research & Education (SCORE) and Xpert Orthopedie, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Inger N. Sierevelt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gino M.M.J. Kerkhoffs Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Amsterdam, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Gino M.M.J. Kerkhoffs in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Daniël Haverkamp Specialized Centre of Othopedic Research & Education (SCORE) and Xpert Orthopedie, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Search for other papers by Daniël Haverkamp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Total hip arthroplasty is performed more frequently in younger patients nowadays, making long-term bone stock preservation an important topic. A mechanism for late implant failure is periprosthetic bone loss, caused by stress shielding around the hip stem due to different load distribution. Short stems are designed to keep the physical loading in the proximal part of the femur to reduce stress shielding. The aim of this review is to give more insight into how short and anatomic stems behave and whether they succeed in preservation of proximal bone stock.

  • A systematic literature search was performed to find all published studies on bone mineral density in short and anatomic hip stems. Results on periprosthetic femoral bone mineral density, measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), were compiled and analysed per Gruen zone in percentual change.

  • A total of 29 studies were included. In short stems, Gruen 1 showed bone loss of 5% after one year (n = 855) and 5% after two years (n = 266). Gruen 7 showed bone loss of 10% after one year and –11% after two years. In anatomic stems, Gruen 1 showed bone loss of 8% after one year (n = 731) and 11% after two years (n = 227). Gruen 7 showed bone loss of 14% after one year and 15% after two years.

  • Short stems are capable of preserving proximal bone stock and have slightly less proximal bone loss in the first years, compared to anatomic stems.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:1040-1051. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210030

Open access

Low-dose dexamethasone during arthroplasty

What do we know about the risks?

Jessica T. Wegener Department of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Jessica T. Wegener in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tim Kraal Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center and the Orthopedic Research Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Tim Kraal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Markus F. Stevens Department of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Markus F. Stevens in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Markus W. Hollmann Department of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Markus W. Hollmann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gino M.M.J. Kerkhoffs Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center and the Orthopedic Research Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Gino M.M.J. Kerkhoffs in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Daniël Haverkamp Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Slotervaart Ziekenhuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Daniël Haverkamp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Dexamethasone is commonly applied during arthroplasty to control post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV). However, conflicting views of orthopaedic surgeons and anaesthesiologists regarding the use of dexamethasone raise questions about risks of impaired wound healing and surgical site infections (SSI).

  • The aim of this systematic review is to determine the level of evidence for the safety of a peri-operative single low dose of dexamethasone in hip and knee arthroplasty.

  • We systematically reviewed literature in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases and cited references in articles found in the initial search from 1980 to 2013 based on predefined inclusion criteria. The review was completed with a ‘pro’ and ‘con’ discussion.

  • After identifying 11 studies out of 104, only eight studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 1335 patients were studied without any incidence of SSI. Causes of SSI are multifactorial. Therefore, 27 205 patients would be required (power = 90%, alpha = 0.05) to provide substantiated conclusions on safety of a single low dose of dexamethasone.

  • Positively, many studies demonstrated showed convincing effects of low-dose dexamethasone on prevention of PONV and dose-dependent effects on post-operative pain and quality of recovery. Dexamethasone induces hyperglycaemia, but none of the studies demonstrated a concomitant SSI.

  • Conversely, animal studies showed that high dose dexamethasone inhibits wound healing.

  • A team approach of anaesthesiologists and orthopaedic surgeons is mandatory in order to balance the risk–benefit ratio of peri-operatively applied steroids for individual arthroplasty patients.

  • We did not find evidence that a single low dose of dexamethasone contributes to SSI or wound healing impairment from the current studies.

Cite this article: Wegener JT, Kraal T, Stevens MF, Hollman MW, Kerkhoffs GMMJ, Haverkamp D. Low-dose dexamethasone during arthroplasty: what do we know about the risks? EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:303-309. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000039.

Open access