Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for

  • Author: Carlos A. Higuera-Rueda x
Clear All Modify Search
Kavin Sundaram Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Orthopedics Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for other papers by Kavin Sundaram in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ahmed Siddiqi Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Orthopedics Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for other papers by Ahmed Siddiqi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Atul F. Kamath Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Orthopedics Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for other papers by Atul F. Kamath in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Carlos A. Higuera-Rueda Cleveland Clinic Florida, Department of Orthopedics Weston, Florida, USA

Search for other papers by Carlos A. Higuera-Rueda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Trochanteric osteotomy is a technique that allows expanded exposure and access to the femoral canal and acetabulum for a number of indications.

  • There has been renewed interest in variants of this technique, including the trochanteric slide osteotomy (TSO), extended trochanter osteotomy (ETO), and the transfemoral approach, for both septic and aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA).

  • Osteotomy fixation is crucial for achieving union, and wire and cable-plate systems are the most common techniques.

  • TSO involves the creation of a greater trochanter fragment with preserved abductor attachment proximally and vastus lateralis attachment distally.

  • This technique may be particularly useful in the setting of abductor deficiency or when augmented acetabular exposure is needed.

  • ETO is a posterior-laterally based extensile approach that has been successfully utilized for aseptic and septic indications; most series report a greater than 90% rate of union.

  • The transfemoral approach, as known as the Wagner osteotomy, is an extensile femoral approach and is more anterior-based than the alternate posterior-based ETO. It may be particularly useful for anterior-based approaches and anterior femoral remodelling; rates of union after this approach in most reports have been close to 100%.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:477-485. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190063

Open access