Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for

  • Author: Arya Nicum x
Clear All Modify Search
Arya Nicum Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, UK

Search for other papers by Arya Nicum in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Harry Hothi Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, UK

Search for other papers by Harry Hothi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Johann Henckel Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.

Search for other papers by Johann Henckel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Anna di Laura Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, UK

Search for other papers by Anna di Laura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Klaus Schlueter-Brust Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Franziskus Hospital Köln, Köln, Germany

Search for other papers by Klaus Schlueter-Brust in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Alister Hart Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, UK
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Cleveland Clinic London, London, UK

Search for other papers by Alister Hart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Three-dimensional printing is a rapidly growing manufacturing method for orthopaedic implants and it is currently thriving in several other engineering industries. It enables the variation of implant design and the construction of complex structures which can be exploited in orthopaedics and other medical sectors.

  • In this review, we develop the vocabulary to characterise 3D printing in orthopaedics from terms defined by industries employing 3D printing, and by fully examining a 3D-printed off-the-shelf acetabular cup (Fig. 1). This is a commonly used 3D-printed implant in orthopaedics, and it exhibits a range of prominent features brought about by 3D printing.

  • The key features and defects of the porous and dense regions of the implant are clarified and discussed in depth to determine reliable definitions and a common understanding of characteristics of 3D printing between engineers and medical experts in orthopaedics.

  • Despite the extensive list of terminology derived here, it is clear significant gaps exist in the knowledge of this field. Therefore, it is necessary for continued investigations of unused implants, but perhaps more significantly, examining those in vivo and retrieved to understand their long-term impact on patients and the effects of certain features (e.g. surface-adhered particles).

  • Analyses of this kind will establish an understanding of 3D printing in orthopaedics and additionally it will help to update the regulatory approach to this new technology.

Open access