Search Results
Bucharest Emergency Clinical Hospital, Romania
Search for other papers by Razvan Ene in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Mihai Nica in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Bucharest Emergency Clinical Hospital, Romania
Search for other papers by Dragos Ene in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Adrian Cursaru in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Catalin Cirstoiu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
Infection in orthopaedic and trauma surgery remains a destructive complication with particularly challenging diagnosis and treatment due to bacterial antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation.
-
Along with surgical debridement and systemic antibiotics, an important type of adjuvant therapy is local antibiotic delivery, with the purpose of eliminating bacterial colonization and biofilm development.
-
Calcium sulphate, as a synthetic absorbable biomaterial used for local antibiotic delivery, has experienced an increasing popularity during the last decade, with multiple promoted advantages such as predictable antibiotic elution kinetics, complete and quick biodegradation, good biocompatibility, and limited associated complications.
-
A series of commercially available antibiotic-delivery systems based on calcium sulphate are under investigation and in clinical use, with different presentations, compositions, and application techniques.
-
The current article presents the main available calcium-sulphate-based products and the existing data about the clinical and preclinical research results, stemming from their implementation as local antibiotic carriers for surgical site and implant-associated infections treatment and prevention.
Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:297-304. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200083
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Bogdan Serban in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Bogdan Cretu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Adrian Cursaru in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Elias University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Cornelia Nitipir in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Elias University Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Cristina Orlov-Slavu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Catalin Cirstoiu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
Patients diagnosed with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) present a number of challenges for physicians, due to the vast array of subtypes and aggressive tumor biology.
-
There is currently no agreed-upon management strategy for these tumors, which has led to the ongoing debate surrounding how frequently surveillance scans should be performed following surgery. However, advances in multidisciplinary care have improved patient outcomes over recent years.
-
The early detection of local recurrence reflects a more aggressive tumor, even in association with the same histopathologic entity.
-
Treating the local recurrence of extremity STS is a difficult clinical challenge. The goal should be to salvage limbs when possible, with treatments such as resection and irradiation, although amputation may be necessary in some cases. Regional therapies such as high-intensity, low-dose or interleukin-1 receptor antagonist treatment are appealing options for either definitive or adjuvant therapy, depending on the location of the disease’s recurrence.
-
The higher survival rate following late recurrence may be explained by variations in tumor biology. Since long-term survival is, in fact, inferior in patients with high-grade STS, this necessitates the implementation of an active surveillance approach.
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Catalin Cirstoiu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Bogdan Cretu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Sergiu Iordache in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Mihnea Popa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Bogdan Serban in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
Search for other papers by Adrian Cursaru in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
Bone metastases are difficult to treat surgically, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach that must be applied to each patient depending on the specifics of their case.
-
The main indications for surgical treatment are a lack of response to chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormone therapy, immunotherapy, and bisphosphonates which is defined by persistent pain or tumor progression; the risk of imminent pathological bone fracture; and surgical treatment for single bone metastases.
-
An important aspect of choosing the right treatment for these patients is accurately estimating life expectancy. Improved chemotherapy, postoperative radiation therapy, and sustainable reconstructive modalities will increase the patient’s life expectancy.
-
The surgeon should select the best surgical strategy based on the primary tumor and its characteristics, the presence of single or multiple metastases, age, anatomical location, and the functional resources of the patient.
-
Preventive osteosynthesis, osteosynthesis to stabilize a fracture, resections, and reconstructions are the main surgical options for bone metastases.
-
Resection and reconstruction with a modular prosthesis remain the generally approved surgical option to restore functionality, increase the quality of life, and increase life expectancy.
-
Preoperative embolization is necessary, especially in the case of metastases of renal or thyroid origin. This procedure is extremely important to avoid complications, with a major impact on survival rates.