Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for :

  • Author: Romain Seil x
Clear All Modify Search
Alli Gokeler University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Human Movement Science, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Alli Gokeler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Bart Dingenen Rehabilitation Research Institute, Biomedical Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, UHasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium

Search for other papers by Bart Dingenen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Caroline Mouton Département de l’Appareil Locomoteur, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg – Clinique d’Eich, 76, rue d’Eich, L-1460 Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Search for other papers by Caroline Mouton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Romain Seil Département de l’Appareil Locomoteur, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg – Clinique d’Eich, 76, rue d’Eich, L-1460 Luxembourg, Luxembourg and Sports Medicine Research Laboratory, Luxembourg Institute of Health, 76, rue d’Eich, L-1460 Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Search for other papers by Romain Seil in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Almost all athletes who have suffered an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury expect a full return to sports at the same pre-injury level after ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Detailed patient information on the reasonable outcomes of the surgery may be essential to improve patient satisfaction.

  • Pre-operative rehabilitation before ACLR should be considered as an addition to the standard of care to maximise functional outcomes after ACLR.

  • We propose an optimised criterion-based rehabilitation programme within a biopsychosocial framework.

  • No benchmark exists for evaluating return-to-sport (RTS) readiness after ACLR. Therefore, the authors propose a multi-factorial RTS test battery. A combination of both physical and psychological elements should be included in the RTS test battery.

  • There is need for shared decision-making regarding RTS.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2017;2:410-420. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.170011

Open access
Andrea Pratobevera Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy

Search for other papers by Andrea Pratobevera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Romain Seil Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Luxembourg-Clinique d’Eich, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Luxembourg Institute of Research in Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine and Science (LIROMS), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Luxembourg-Clinique d’Eich, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

Search for other papers by Romain Seil in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Jacques Menetrey Centre de Medecine du Sport et de l’Exercice - Swiss Olympic Medical Center, Hirslanden Clinique La Colline, Geneva, Switzerland
Orthopaedic Surgery Service, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Jacques Menetrey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • This review explores the intricate relationship between knee osteotomy and frontal plane joint line orientation, emphasizing the dynamic nature of the joint line’s influence on knee forces and kinematics.

  • Consideration of coronal alignments, knee phenotypes, and associated angles (medial proximal tibial angle (MTPA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA)) becomes crucial in surgical planning to avoid joint line deformities.

  • The double-level osteotomy is to be considered a valid option, especially for severe deformities; however, the target patient cannot be selected solely based on high predicted postoperative joint line obliquity (JLO) and MPTA.

Open access