Search Results

You are looking at 1 - 1 of 1 items for :

  • Author: Lorenzo Garagnani x
  • Hand & Wrist x
Clear All Modify Search
Andrea Fidanza Unit of Orthopaedics and Traumatology - Department of life, Health & Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Italy
Hand Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Andrea Fidanza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stefano Necozione Unit of Clinical Epidemiology - Department of life, Health & Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila, Italy

Search for other papers by Stefano Necozione in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Lorenzo Garagnani Hand Unit, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK

Search for other papers by Lorenzo Garagnani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purpose

  • Partial wrist denervation can be performed by isolated posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) or combined PIN plus (+) anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) neurectomy procedures.

  • The purpose of the current systematic review is to investigate any differences in clinical outcomes and failures in patients undergoing AIN + PIN vs isolated PIN neurectomy.

Methods

  • A review of the English Literature was performed on Medline, WOS and Scopus according to PRISMA protocol combining ‘wrist denervation’, ‘PIN neurectomy’, ‘AIN neurectomy’, anterior interosseous nerve neurectomy’ and ‘posterior interosseous nerve neurectomy’. Studies were assessed with a modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS). The primary outcome for meta-analysis was ‘Failures’, including all patients who have required a second surgery or those who are left with pain (defined as ‘bad’).

Results

  • Overall, 10 studies totalling 347 wrists were included in this systematic review, with a ‘moderate’ CMS. The isolated PIN neurectomy technique showed a 15.1% pooled failure rate at a median follow-up of 22 months, while the combined AIN+PIN denervation had a pooled failure rate of 23.6% at a follow-up with a median of 29 months. The combined analysis of both procedures did not show significantly better results in favour of either technique, with a general failure rate of 21.6% (P = 0.0501).

Conclusion

  • Partial denervation for chronic wrist pain is a salvage procedure that leads to an overall success of 78.4% for pain relief, with no substantial complications. Apparently, performing the neurectomy also of the AIN does not offer greater advantages compared to the isolated PIN neurectomy.

Open access