Oncology

You are looking at 11 - 20 of 28 items

Catalin Cirstoiu Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

Search for other papers by Catalin Cirstoiu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Bogdan Cretu Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

Search for other papers by Bogdan Cretu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sergiu Iordache Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

Search for other papers by Sergiu Iordache in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mihnea Popa Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

Search for other papers by Mihnea Popa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Bogdan Serban Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

Search for other papers by Bogdan Serban in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Adrian Cursaru Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

Search for other papers by Adrian Cursaru in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Bone metastases are difficult to treat surgically, necessitating a multidisciplinary approach that must be applied to each patient depending on the specifics of their case.

  • The main indications for surgical treatment are a lack of response to chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormone therapy, immunotherapy, and bisphosphonates which is defined by persistent pain or tumor progression; the risk of imminent pathological bone fracture; and surgical treatment for single bone metastases.

  • An important aspect of choosing the right treatment for these patients is accurately estimating life expectancy. Improved chemotherapy, postoperative radiation therapy, and sustainable reconstructive modalities will increase the patient’s life expectancy.

  • The surgeon should select the best surgical strategy based on the primary tumor and its characteristics, the presence of single or multiple metastases, age, anatomical location, and the functional resources of the patient.

  • Preventive osteosynthesis, osteosynthesis to stabilize a fracture, resections, and reconstructions are the main surgical options for bone metastases.

  • Resection and reconstruction with a modular prosthesis remain the generally approved surgical option to restore functionality, increase the quality of life, and increase life expectancy.

  • Preoperative embolization is necessary, especially in the case of metastases of renal or thyroid origin. This procedure is extremely important to avoid complications, with a major impact on survival rates.

Open access
Stephanie Marrannes Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Stephanie Marrannes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Klaas Victor Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Leuven, Belgium

Search for other papers by Klaas Victor in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Nele Arnout Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Nele Arnout in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tine De Backer Department of Cardiology, Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Tine De Backer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jan Victor Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Jan Victor in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Thomas Tampere Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Ghent University, Belgium

Search for other papers by Thomas Tampere in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication following orthopaedic surgery. The incidence of this complication has decreased substantially since the introduction of routine thromboprophylaxis. However, concerns have been raised about increased bleeding complications caused by aggressive thromboprophylaxis.

  • Attention has grown for aspirin as a safer thromboprophylactic agent following orthopaedic surgery.

  • A systematic review using MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of aspirin prophylaxis following knee surgery with the current standard prophylactic agents (low molecular weight heparin [LMWH], vitamin K antagonists and factor Xa inhibitors).

  • No significant difference in effectiveness of VTE prevention was found between aspirin, LMWH and warfarin. Factor Xa inhibitors were more effective, but increased bleeding complications were reported.

  • As evidence is limited and of low quality with substantial heterogeneity, further research with high-quality, adequately powered trials is needed.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:892-904. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200120

Open access
Olga Savvidou First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
These authors contributed equally to this manuscript

Search for other papers by Olga Savvidou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Olympia Papakonstantinou Second Department of Radiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, Attikon University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
These authors contributed equally to this manuscript

Search for other papers by Olympia Papakonstantinou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Eleftheria Lakiotaki First Department of Pathology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
These authors contributed equally to this manuscript

Search for other papers by Eleftheria Lakiotaki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ioannis Zafeiris First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece

Search for other papers by Ioannis Zafeiris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dimitra Melissaridou First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece

Search for other papers by Dimitra Melissaridou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pinelopi Korkolopoulou First Department of Pathology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, Athens, Greece
Co-senior authors

Search for other papers by Pinelopi Korkolopoulou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
Co-senior authors

Search for other papers by Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Surface bone sarcomas are rare malignant bone tumours. Osseous and cartilaginous surface bone sarcomas are the most common, with parosteal and periosteal osteosarcomas, periosteal chondrosarcomas and secondary peripheral chondrosarcomas being the most frequent.

  • Their clinical symptoms are non-specific and include pain for several months, swelling and limited range of motion of the adjacent joints.

  • Prompt diagnosis is important, as biological behaviour, imaging and histopathologic characteristics, treatment and prognosis differ considerably from their conventional intramedullary counterparts. Moreover, their imaging characteristics are not infrequently non-characteristic and may be misinterpreted as juxtacortical benign lesions leading to incorrect diagnosis and treatment, with life-threatening repercussions. Molecular studies and histopathological sampling are essential for accurate diagnosis.

  • There are still numerous issues regarding the biology, pathophysiology and treatment options of these entities due to their rarity.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:905-917. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210064

Open access
Joaquim Soares do Brito Orthopedics Department, University Hospital of Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for other papers by Joaquim Soares do Brito in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
André Spranger Orthopedics Department, University Hospital of Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for other papers by André Spranger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Paulo Almeida Orthopedics Department, University Hospital of Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for other papers by Paulo Almeida in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
José Portela Orthopedics Department, University Hospital of Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for other papers by José Portela in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Irene Barrientos-Ruiz Orthopedics Department, University Hospital of La Paz, Madrid

Search for other papers by Irene Barrientos-Ruiz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Giant cell tumour of bone (GCT) is a relatively rare, locally aggressive benign neoplasm observed in the long bone epiphyseal-metaphyseal regions of young adults.

  • The optimal treatment strategy for these tumours remains controversial, and a huge amount of contradictory data regarding the functional and oncological outcomes can be found. Therefore, we performed a systematic review intended to investigate the functional and oncological outcomes after surgical treatment of GCTs arising around the knee, namely in the distal femur and proximal tibia.

  • A trend towards better oncological control was found using wide resections, nonetheless, curettage-based techniques achieve a highly acceptable recurrence rate with overall better knee function. A slight advantage favouring proximal tibia GCTs regarding the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score was also observed.

  • Prospective studies comparing groups of more homogeneous patients, tumours, and treatment options should be developed to obtain more conclusive and definitive results regarding the optimal strategy for treating GCTs.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:641-650. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200154

Open access
Olga Savvidou First Department of Orthopedics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, ATTIKON University General Hospital, Greece
These authors contributed equally to this manuscript

Search for other papers by Olga Savvidou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Olympia Papakonstantinou Second Department of Radiology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, ATTIKON University General Hospital, Athens, Greece
These authors contributed equally to this manuscript

Search for other papers by Olympia Papakonstantinou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Eleftheria Lakiotaki First Department of Pathology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, LAIKON General Hospital, Athens, Greece
These authors contributed equally to this manuscript

Search for other papers by Eleftheria Lakiotaki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dimitra Melissaridou First Department of Orthopedics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, ATTIKON University General Hospital, Greece

Search for other papers by Dimitra Melissaridou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pinelopi Korkolopoulou First Department of Pathology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, LAIKON General Hospital, Athens, Greece
Co-senior authors

Search for other papers by Pinelopi Korkolopoulou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos First Department of Orthopedics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, ATTIKON University General Hospital, Greece
Co-senior authors

Search for other papers by Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Myositis ossificans (MO) is a benign bone formation in an extra-skeletal location. The most common subtype of MO, the post-traumatic, usually develops in young males after a traumatic event or sports injury.

  • MO may simulate malignant bone lesions such as extra-skeletal or surface osteosarcomas, or soft tissue sarcomas such as synovial sarcoma or undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. In the early phase the diagnosis of MO is challenging because imaging and histopathological findings may be non-characteristic.

  • Detailed medical history as well as clinical examination, follow-up imaging studies and histological assessment are crucial for a proper diagnosis. Early and accurate differential diagnosis between MO and malignant soft tissue and bone tumours is important to maximize.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:572-583. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210002

Open access
Maria Anna Smolle Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for other papers by Maria Anna Smolle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joanna Szkandera Division of Clinical Oncology, Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for other papers by Joanna Szkandera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Dimosthenis Andreou Division of Orthopaedic Oncology and Sarcoma Surgery, Helios Klinikum Bad Saarow, Sarcoma Center Berlin-Brandenburg, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Dimosthenis Andreou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Emanuela Palmerini Chemotherapy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna University, Bologna, Italy

Search for other papers by Emanuela Palmerini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Marko Bergovec Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for other papers by Marko Bergovec in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Andreas Leithner Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for other papers by Andreas Leithner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • In patients with metastatic or unresectable soft tissue and bone sarcoma of extremities and pelvis, survival is generally poor. The aim of the current systematic review was to analyse recent publications on treatment approaches in patients with inoperable and/or metastatic sarcoma.

  • Original articles published between 1st January 2011 and 2nd May 2020, using the search terms ‘unresectable sarcoma’, ‘inoperability AND sarcoma’, ‘inoperab* AND sarcoma’, and ‘treatment AND unresectable AND sarcoma’ in PubMed, were potentially eligible. Out of the 839 initial articles (containing 274 duplicates) obtained and 23 further articles identified by cross-reference checking, 588 were screened, of which 447 articles were removed not meeting the inclusion criteria. A further 54 articles were excluded following full-text assessment, resulting in 87 articles finally being analysed.

  • Of the 87 articles, 38 were retrospective (43.7%), two prospective (2.3%), six phase I or I/II trials (6.9%), 22 phase II non-randomized trials (27.6%), nine phase II randomized trials (10.3%) and eight phase III randomized trials (9.2%). Besides radio/particle therapy, isolated limb perfusion and conventional chemotherapy, novel therapeutic approaches, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors were also identified, with partially very promising effects in advanced sarcomas.

  • Management of inoperable, advanced or metastatic sarcomas of the pelvis and extremities remains challenging, with the optimal treatment to be defined individually. Besides conventional chemotherapy, some novel therapeutic approaches have promising effects in both bone and soft tissue subtypes. Considering that only a small proportion of studies were randomized, the clinical evidence currently remains moderate and thus calls for further large, randomized clinical trials.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:799-814. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200069

Open access
Maria Beatriz Quaresma Orthopaedics Department, University Hospital Santa Maria – Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for other papers by Maria Beatriz Quaresma in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
José Portela Orthopaedics Department, University Hospital Santa Maria – Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for other papers by José Portela in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Joaquim Soares do Brito Orthopaedics Department, University Hospital Santa Maria – Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for other papers by Joaquim Soares do Brito in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Diffuse-type tenosynovial giant-cell tumours of the knee (D-TGCT) have a very high complication rate.

  • The recurrence rate for D-TGCT is mainly dependent on an initially successful resection of the lesion.

  • The standard of care for this disease involves early surgery with synovectomy. Available surgical techniques may include an arthroscopic or open surgery; however, there is a lack of consensus on which technique should be used, and when.

  • Arthroscopic excision is effective in minimizing morbidity and surgery-related complications, while an open surgical technique provides a more successful resection with a lower incidence of local recurrence.

  • We could not conclude with confidence which of the surgical techniques is better at stopping a progression towards osteoarthritis and the need for a total knee arthroplasty.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:339-346. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200005

Open access
Ajay Puri Department of Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, HBNI, Mumbai

Search for other papers by Ajay Puri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Chondrosarcomas in children and adolescents are uncommon and constitute < 5% of all chondrosarcomas. There are very few studies discussing extremity chondrosarcomas in young patients.

  • The pelvis is the most common site, followed by the proximal femur.

  • As cartilaginous tumours can be quite challenging to diagnose, it is best for these lesions to be discussed in a multidisciplinary meeting which includes a radiologist and a pathologist specializing in bone tumours.

  • Treatment principles are similar to those in adults, with adequate surgical excision respecting oncologic principles being the mainstay of treatment. Select extremity Grade I chondrosarcomas may be managed with extended intralesional curettage without increasing the risk for local recurrence or metastatic disease, but case selection is critical and should be based on clinical, imaging and histological characteristics.

  • Chondrosarcomas are resistant to chemotherapy and relatively radioresistant. For mesenchymal chondrosarcomas, there may be a role for chemotherapy, though data on this is limited.

  • Prognosis and rate of recurrence correlate directly to the adequacy of the surgical resection.

  • Chondrosarcomas in younger patients behave in a similar fashion to those in adults, and outcomes in the young are no different from those in adults.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:90-95. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190052

Open access
Stijn E. W. Geraets Department of Orthopaedics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Stijn E. W. Geraets in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
P. Koen Bos Department of Orthopaedics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by P. Koen Bos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Johan van der Stok Department of Orthopaedics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Johan van der Stok in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Surgery of long bone metastases is associated with a significant risk of perioperative blood loss, which may necessitate blood transfusion.

  • Successful embolization (> 70% obliteration of vascularity) can be achieved in 36–75% of cases.

  • The reported rate of embolization-related complications is 0–9%.

  • Three out of six level III evidence studies showed a reduction in perioperative blood loss and/or blood transfusion requirement after preoperative embolization of renal cell carcinoma metastasis in long bones; three out of six studies did not.

  • One level III evidence study did not show a reduction in perioperative blood loss and/or transfusion requirement after preoperative embolization of hepatocellular carcinoma metastases in long bones.

  • There were no studies found that support preoperative embolization of thyroid metastases or other frequent long bone metastases (e.g. mamma carcinoma, lung carcinoma, or prostate carcinoma).

  • The clinical level of evidence of the studies found is low and randomized studies taking into account primary tumour, location of metastases and type of surgery are therefore desired.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:17-25. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190013

Open access
Olga D. Savvidou First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ‘ATTIKON’ Hospital, Athens, Greece

Search for other papers by Olga D. Savvidou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Panagiotis Koutsouradis Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mediterraneo Hospital, Athens, Greece

Search for other papers by Panagiotis Koutsouradis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ioanna K. Bolia First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ‘ATTIKON’ Hospital, Athens, Greece

Search for other papers by Ioanna K. Bolia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Angelos Kaspiris Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology/Sector for Bone Research, School of Health Sciences, University of Patras, Patras 26504, Greece

Search for other papers by Angelos Kaspiris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
George D. Chloros First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ‘ATTIKON’ Hospital, Athens, Greece

Search for other papers by George D. Chloros in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, ‘ATTIKON’ Hospital, Athens, Greece

Search for other papers by Panayiotis J. Papagelopoulos in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Soft tissue tumours of the elbow are mostly benign. Malignant tumours in this area, although uncommon, often present unique clinical and histopathological characteristics that are helpful for diagnosis.

  • Management of soft tissue tumours around the elbow may be challenging because of their rarity and the proximity to neurovascular structures. Careful staging, histological diagnosis and treatment are essential to optimize clinical outcome. A missed or delayed diagnosis or an improperly executed biopsy may have devastating consequences for the patient.

  • This article reviews the most common benign and malignant soft tissue tumours of the elbow and discusses the clinicopathological findings, imaging features and current therapeutic concepts.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2019;4:668-677. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.190002

Open access