Knee

You are looking at 41 - 50 of 99 items

Charles Rivière Clinique du Sport, Bordeaux-Mérignac, France
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for other papers by Charles Rivière in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
William Jackson Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by William Jackson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Loïc Villet Clinique du Sport, Bordeaux-Mérignac, France
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for other papers by Loïc Villet in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sivan Sivaloganathan Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
South-West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre, Epsom, UK

Search for other papers by Sivan Sivaloganathan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yaron Barziv Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Shamir Medical Center, Zriffin, Israel

Search for other papers by Yaron Barziv in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Pascal-André Vendittoli Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Département de Chirurgie, Université de Montréal, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montréal, Québec, Canada

Search for other papers by Pascal-André Vendittoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • The Kinematic Alignment (KA) technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an alternative surgical technique aiming to resurface knee articular surfaces.

  • The restricted KA (rKA) technique for TKA applies boundaries to the KA technique in order to avoid reproducing extreme constitutional limb/knee anatomies.

  • The vast majority of TKA cases are straightforward and can be performed with KA in a standard (unrestricted) fashion.

  • There are some specific situations where performing KA TKA may be more challenging (complex KA TKA cases) and surgical technique adaptations should be included.

  • To secure good clinical outcomes, complex KA TKA cases must be preoperatively recognized, and planned accordingly.

  • The proposed classification system describes six specific issues that must be considered when aiming for a KA TKA implantation.

  • Specific recommendations for each situation type should improve the reliability of the prosthetic implantation to the benefit of the patient.

  • The proposed classification system could contribute to the adoption of a common language within our orthopaedic community that would ease inter-surgeon communication and could benefit the teaching of the KA technique. This proposed classification system is not exhaustive and will certainly be improved over time.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:881-891. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210042

Open access
Stein J. Janssen Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Stein J. Janssen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Iris van Oost Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, FORCE (Foundation for Orthopaedic Research Care Education), Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Iris van Oost in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Stefan J.M. Breugem Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bergman Clinics, Naarden, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Stefan J.M. Breugem in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Rutger C.I. van Geenen Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, FORCE (Foundation for Orthopaedic Research Care Education), Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Rutger C.I. van Geenen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has several advantages over total knee arthroplasty; however, in many reports, the risk of revision remains higher after UKA.

  • Many reasons for failure of UKA exist.

  • Successful treatment starts with accurate assessment of the symptomatic UKA as a specific mode of failure requires a specific solution.

  • A structured and comprehensive evaluation aids assessment of the symptomatic UKA.

  • This review provides an overview of the causes for a symptomatic medial UKA, its risk factors, diagnostic modalities that can be used, and briefly discusses treatment options.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:850-860. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200105

Open access
Chilan Bou Ghosson Leite Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clinicas, HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Search for other papers by Chilan Bou Ghosson Leite in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Patricia Moreno Grangeiro Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clinicas, HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Search for other papers by Patricia Moreno Grangeiro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Diego Ubrig Munhoz Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clinicas, HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Search for other papers by Diego Ubrig Munhoz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Pedro Nogueira Giglio Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clinicas, HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Search for other papers by Pedro Nogueira Giglio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Gilberto Luis Camanho Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clinicas, HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Search for other papers by Gilberto Luis Camanho in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Riccardo Gomes Gobbi Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clinicas, HCFMUSP, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil

Search for other papers by Riccardo Gomes Gobbi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Congenital femoral deficiency (CFD) is a rare disorder with several limb anomalies including limb shortening and knee cruciate ligament dysplasia.

  • Limb lengthening is usually performed to correct lower limb discrepancy. However, complications, such as knee subluxation/dislocation, can occur during this treatment.

  • Here, we explore CFD knee abnormalities and knee dislocation during limb elongation, discussing when and whether knee ligament reconstruction prior to the lengthening would be necessary to reduce the risk of knee dislocation.

  • There is not enough support in the literature for the routine reconstruction of cruciate ligaments in CFD patients.

  • Of note, in cases of severe anteroposterior or posterolateral rotatory instability, cruciate ligament reconstruction might be considered to decrease the risk of knee subluxation/dislocation during the lengthening treatment.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:565-571. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200075

Open access
Piti Rattanaprichavej Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand

Search for other papers by Piti Rattanaprichavej in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Patapong Towiwat Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand

Search for other papers by Patapong Towiwat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Artit Laoruengthana Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand

Search for other papers by Artit Laoruengthana in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Piyameth Dilokthornsakul Center of Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research, Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand

Search for other papers by Piyameth Dilokthornsakul in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk Department of Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

Search for other papers by Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective procedure to treat many patients with end-stage knee arthropathy. However, the extension of TKA for patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy (CNA) is controversial, with relatively limited evidence defining optimal reconstruction techniques.

  • This systematic review of relevant studies that were published from January 2000 to June 2020 aimed to define survivorship, complications, reoperation, and component revision rates of contemporary TKA performed for CNA.

  • We identified 127 TKA performed for CNA in five studies that comprised ≥ 7 knees with ≥ 5 years of follow-up.

  • Overall implant survivorship was 85.4%. The overall complication rate was 26.4%, with the most common complications including instability (24.0%), periprosthetic fracture (17.4%), infection (13.0%), ligament injury (10.9%) and aseptic loosening (10.9%).

  • The aetiology of CNA and prosthesis type had no influence on clinical outcomes, whereas the effect of staging of disease and ataxia status was still inconclusive.

  • Understanding the potential determinants, survivorship and risk of complications related to TKA performed in CNA may help surgeons to deal with patient expectations.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:556-564. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200103

Open access
Gerardo Fusco Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Milan, Italy
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
These authors contributed equally to the article and should both be considered first authors

Search for other papers by Gerardo Fusco in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Francesco M. Gambaro Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Milan, Italy
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
These authors contributed equally to the article and should both be considered first authors

Search for other papers by Francesco M. Gambaro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Berardo Di Matteo Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Milan, Italy
First Moscow State Medical University – Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia

Search for other papers by Berardo Di Matteo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Elizaveta Kon Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Milan, Italy
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Elizaveta Kon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Knee osteoarthritis is a degenerative condition characterized by progressive cartilage degradation, subchondral damage, and bone remodelling. Among the approaches implemented to achieve symptomatic and functional improvements, injection treatments have gained increasing attention due to the possibility of intra-articular delivery with reduced side effects compared to systemic therapies.

  • In addition to well-established treatment options such as hyaluronic acid (HA), cortico-steroids (CS) and oxygen-ozone therapy, many other promising products have been employed in the last decades such as polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) and biologic agents such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Moreover, ultrasound-guided intra-meniscal injection and X-ray-guided subchondral injection techniques have been introduced into clinical practice.

  • Even when not supported by high evidence consensus, intra-articular CS and HA injections have gained precise indications for symptomatic relief and clinical improvement in OA. Biological products are strongly supported by in vitro evidence but there is still a lack of robust clinical evidence. PRP and MSCs seem to relieve OA symptoms through a regulation of the joint homeostasis, even if their capability to restore articular cartilage is still to be proved in vivo.

  • Due to increasing interest in the subchondral bone pathology, subchondral injections have been developed with promising results in delaying joint replacement. Nevertheless, due to their recent development and the heterogeneity of the injected products (biologic agents or calcium phosphate), this approach still lacks strong enough evidence to be fully endorsed.

  • Combined biological treatments, nano-molecular approaches, monoclonal antibodies and ‘personalized’ target therapies are currently under development or under investigation with the aim of expanding our armamentarium against knee OA.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:501-509. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210026

Open access
Nuno Marques Luís Knee and Ankle Surgery, Arthroscopy and Sports Trauma Unit; Orthopedic Center, Hospital Cuf Descobertas, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for other papers by Nuno Marques Luís in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Ricardo Varatojo Knee and Ankle Surgery, Arthroscopy and Sports Trauma Unit; Orthopedic Center, Hospital Cuf Descobertas, Lisbon, Portugal

Search for other papers by Ricardo Varatojo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • The full-length standing radiograph in an anteroposterior projection is the primary tool for defining and measuring limb alignment with definition of the physiological axes and mechanical and anatomic angles of the lower limb.

  • We define the deformities of the lower limb and the importance of correct surgical planning and execution.

  • For patients with torsional malalignment of the lower limb, computerized tomography scan evaluation is the gold standard for preoperative assessment.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:487-494. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210015

Open access
Paolo Salari Institute for Complex Arthroplasty and Revisions (ICAR), Villa Ulivella Clinic, Florence, Italy

Search for other papers by Paolo Salari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Andrea Baldini Institute for Complex Arthroplasty and Revisions (ICAR), Villa Ulivella Clinic, Florence, Italy

Search for other papers by Andrea Baldini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) is a challenging procedure with often unreproducible results. A step-by-step approach is fundamental to achieving good outcomes.

  • Successful surgery requires a correct diagnosis of the original cause of failure. Only with an accurate and detailed plan can surgeons overcome difficulties presented in this scenario.

  • Any bone loss should be prevented during prosthetic component removal. Efficient tools must be chosen to avoid time-consuming manoeuvres.

  • Joint reconstruction based on a ‘dual-zone’ fixation is essential to provide a long-term survivorship of the implant. The use of relatively short fully cemented stems combined with a biological metaphyseal fixation is highly recommended by authors.

  • Flexion and extension gaps are accurately balanced after the establishment of the tibial platform.

  • Varus-valgus laxity is commonly managed with a condylar constrained prosthesis. If hinged implants are required, a stronger implant fixation is needed to counteract constraints forces.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:495-500. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210018

Open access
Ahmed Siddiqi Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Orthopedics Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for other papers by Ahmed Siddiqi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Timothy Horan Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Department of Orthopedics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for other papers by Timothy Horan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Robert M. Molloy Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Orthopedics Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for other papers by Robert M. Molloy in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michael R. Bloomfield Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Orthopedics Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for other papers by Michael R. Bloomfield in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Preetesh D. Patel Cleveland Clinic Florida, Department of Orthopedics, Weston, Florida, USA

Search for other papers by Preetesh D. Patel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Nicolas S. Piuzzi Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Department of Orthopedics Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for other papers by Nicolas S. Piuzzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) has shown improved reproducibility and precision in mechanical alignment restoration, with improvement in early functional outcomes and 90-day episode of care cost savings compared to conventional TKA in some studies. However, its value is still to be determined.

  • Current studies of RA-TKA systems are limited by short-term follow-up and significant heterogeneity of the available systems.

  • In today’s paradigm shift towards an increased emphasis on quality of care while curtailing costs, providing value-based care is the primary goal for healthcare systems and clinicians. As robotic technology continues to develop, longer-term studies evaluating implant survivorship and complications will determine whether the initial capital is offset by improved outcomes.

  • Future studies will have to determine the value of RA-TKA based on longer-term survivorships, patient-reported outcome measures, functional outcomes, and patient satisfaction measures.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:252-269. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200071

Open access
Jean-Pierre St Mart Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, King’s College Hospital, London, UK

Search for other papers by Jean-Pierre St Mart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
En Lin Goh Oxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by En Lin Goh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has demonstrated improved component positioning and a reduction of alignment outliers with regard to pre-operative planning.

  • Early robotic TKA technologies were mainly active systems associated with significant technical and surgical complications.

  • Current robotic TKA systems are predominantly semi-active with additional haptic feedback which minimizes iatrogenic soft tissue injury compared to conventional arthroplasty and older systems.

  • Semi-active systems demonstrate advantages in terms of early functional recovery and hospital discharge compared to conventional arthroplasty.

  • Limitations with current robotic technology include high upfront costs, learning curves and lack of long-term outcomes.

  • The short-term gains and greater technical reliability associated with current systems may justify the ongoing investment in robotic technology.

  • Further long-term data are required to fully ascertain the cost-effectiveness of newer robotic systems.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:270-279. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200052

Open access
Jason Trieu University of Melbourne Department of Surgery, Fitzroy, Australia

Search for other papers by Jason Trieu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Chris Schilling University of Melbourne Department of Surgery, Fitzroy, Australia

Search for other papers by Chris Schilling in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michelle M. Dowsey University of Melbourne Department of Surgery, Fitzroy, Australia
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Vincent’s Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia

Search for other papers by Michelle M. Dowsey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Peter F. Choong University of Melbourne Department of Surgery, Fitzroy, Australia
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St Vincent’s Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia

Search for other papers by Peter F. Choong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Despite additional costs associated with the use of computer navigation technology in total knee replacement (TKR), its impact on quality-adjusted life years following surgery has not been demonstrated. Cost-effectiveness evaluations require a balanced assessment of both quality and cost metrics.

  • This review sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of computer navigation, identify barriers to translation, and suggest directions for further investigation. A systematic search of the Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, PubMed, and Embase was undertaken.

  • Cost-effectiveness analyses of computer navigation in primary total knee replacement were identified. Only primary studies of cost-effectiveness analyses published in the English language from the year 2000 onwards were included. Studies that reported secondary data were excluded from the analysis. Four publications met the inclusion criteria.

  • Estimated gains in quality-adjusted life years attributed to reductions in revision surgery were 0.0148 to 0.0164 over 10 years, and 0.0192 (95% CI –0.002 to 0.0473) over 15 years. Cost estimates ranged from 952 kr (US $90, 2020) per case at 250 TKRs/year, to $1,920 US per case at 25 TKRs/year.

  • The estimated probability of meeting local cost-effectiveness thresholds was 54% in the United States and 92% in the United Kingdom. These data were not available for Norway.

  • The cost-effectiveness of computer navigation in current practice settings remains uncertain, with the use of this technology associated with marginal increased quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at additional cost. Existing analyses demonstrated a number of limitations which restrict the potential for translation to practice and policy settings. Further research evaluating the impact of computer navigation on QALYs following primary TKR is required to inform contemporary cost-effectiveness evaluations.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2021;6:173-180. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200073

Open access