Search for other papers by Alessandro Bensa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Alessandro Sangiorgio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Angelo Boffa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Manuela Salerno in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giacomo Moraca in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Applied and Translational Research (ATR) Center, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
Università della Svizzera Italiana, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Lugano, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Giuseppe Filardo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purpose
-
Intra-articular corticosteroid (CS) injections for knee osteoarthritis (OA) management are endorsed by several scientific societies, while the use of hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is more controversial. Aim of the study was to quantify and compare the clinical effectiveness of CS injections with respect to HA and PRP in patients with knee OA.
Methods
-
The search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science following the PRISMA guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the comparison of CS injections and HA or PRP injections for the treatment of knee OA were included. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was used to interpret the clinical relevance of the improvements at different follow-ups up to 12 months. The study quality was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 tool and the GRADE guidelines.
Results
-
Thirty-five RCTs were included (3348 patients). The meta-analysis comparing CS and HA revealed no difference in terms of WOMAC improvement, while HA showed superior VAS pain improvement at long-term follow-up (P = 0.011), without reaching the MCID. PRP offered a superior WOMAC improvement compared to CS at short- (P = 0.002), mid- (P < 0.001, exceeding the MCID), and long-term (P < 0.001, exceeding the MCID) follow-ups. PRP offered a superior VAS improvement at mid- (P < 0.001, exceeding the MCID) and long-term (P = 0.023) follow-ups.
Conclusion
-
CS injections for knee OA offer similar results to HA and PRP only at short term, while there is an overall superiority of PRP at longer follow-ups. This difference is not only statistically significant but also clinically relevant in favour of PRP.
Department of Bone And Joint Diseases, Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital of Henan Province. Orthopedic Hospital of Henan Province, Luoyang, China
Search for other papers by Qiuyuan Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Feng Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yidan Yang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Chen Yue in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Bone And Joint Diseases, Luoyang Orthopedic Hospital of Henan Province. Orthopedic Hospital of Henan Province, Luoyang, China
Search for other papers by Jiayi Guo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purpose
-
Although magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) is widely used as an analgesic adjuvant to peripheral analgesic cocktails, its efficacy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is still controversial. Therefore, we systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the literature to assess the analgesic efficacy of MgSO4 as an adjuvant to the analgesic cocktail in TKA.
Methods
-
The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. The meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Data were qualitatively synthesized or meta-analyzed using a random-effects model.
Results
-
Five randomized controlled trials involving 432 patients were included. Meta-analyses detected significant differences between the MgSO4 and control groups in the visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (rest) at 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively; VAS pain scores (motion) at 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively; morphine consumption within 24 h, 24–48 h, and during the total hospitalization period; time to first rescue analgesia after TKA; and length of hospital stay. Regarding the functional recovery, the meta-analysis demonstrated significant differences between groups in terms of knee range of motion on postoperative day 1; daily mobilization distance on postoperative day 1; and daily mobilization distance. There was no significant intergroup difference in surgical complications.
Conclusion
-
The findings suggest that MgSO4 is a promising adjunct to the analgesic cocktail, achieving significant improvements in pain scores and total opioid consumption during the early postoperative period after TKA.
Search for other papers by Silvia Valisena in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Benjamin Azogui in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rémy S Nizard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philippe M Tscholl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Etienne Cavaignac in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pierre-Alban Bouché in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Didier Hannouche in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purpose
-
Despite the publication of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs), it is not clear which technique for the treatment of focal chondral and osteochondral defects of the knee grants the best clinical outcome. The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and safety of microfractures (MF), autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC), osteochondral autograft transplantation (OCT) at short (< 1 year), intermediate (1–5 years) and long-term (> 5 years).
Methods
-
We carried out an NMA with Bayesian random-effect model, according to PRISMA guidelines. The search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, clinicaltrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, from inception to November 2022. The eligibilities were randomized controlled trials on patients with knee chondral and osteochondral defects, undergoing microfractures, OCT, AMIC, ACI, without restrictions for prior or concomitant surgery on ligaments, menisci or limb alignment, prior surgery for fixation or ablation of osteochondritis dissecans fragments, and prior cartilage procedures as microfractures, drilling, abrasion, or debridement.
Results
-
Nineteen RCTs were included. No difference among treatments was shown in the pooled comparison of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) at any timepoint. Safety data were not available for all trials due to the heterogeneity of reporting, but chondrospheres seemed to have lower failure and reoperation rates.
Conclusion
-
This NMA showed no difference for PROMs with any technique. The lower failure and reoperation rates with chondrospheres must be interpreted with caution since adverse event data was heterogenous among trials. The standardization of the efficacy and safety outcome measures for future trials on knee cartilage repair and regeneration is necessary.
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for other papers by Hsiao-Yi Cheng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Primary Care Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for other papers by Chun-Wei Liang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for other papers by Yu-Hao Lee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Timporn Vitoonpong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Master’s Program in Long-Term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for other papers by Chun-De Liao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for other papers by Shih-Wei Huang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purpose
-
The combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions is strongly recommended by current guidelines for knee osteoarthritis. However, few systematic reviews have validated their combined efficacy. In this study, we investigated the effects of the combination of pharmacological agents and exercise on knee osteoarthritis.
Methods
-
Randomized controlled trials that investigated the efficacy of pharmacological agents combined with exercise for knee osteoarthritis were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to February 2024. The network meta-analysis was performed within the frequentist framework. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI was estimated for pain and function. Grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluations were used to evaluate the certainty of evidence.
Results
-
In total, 71 studies were included. The combination therapy outperformed pharmacological or exercise therapy alone. Among the various pharmacological agents combined with exercise, mesenchymal stem cell injection was ranked the best for short-term pain reduction (SMD: −1.53, 95% CI: −1.92 to −1.13, high certainty), followed by botulinum toxin A, dextrose, and platelet-rich plasma. For long-term pain relief, dextrose prolotherapy was the optimal (SMD: −1.76, 95% CI: −2.65 to −0.88, moderate certainty), followed by mesenchymal stem cells, platelet rich in growth factor, and platelet-rich plasma.
Conclusion
-
Exercise programs should be incorporated into clinical practice and trial design. For patients undergoing exercise therapies, mesenchymal stem cell, dextrose, platelet-rich plasma, platelet rich in growth factor, and botulinum toxin A may be the optimal agents.
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Search for other papers by Gautier Beckers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Clinique Orthopédique Duval, Laval, Quebec, Canada
Search for other papers by Marc-Olivier Kiss in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Clinique Orthopédique Duval, Laval, Quebec, Canada
Search for other papers by Vincent Massé in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Knee Surgery, Casa di Cura Solatrix, Rovereto, TN, Italy
Search for other papers by Michele Malavolta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Clinique Orthopédique Duval, Laval, Quebec, Canada
Search for other papers by Pascal-André Vendittoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
Over the years, with a better understanding of knee anatomy and biomechanics, superior implant designs, advanced surgical techniques, and the availability of precision tools such as robotics and navigation, a more personalized approach to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has emerged.
-
In the presence of extra-articular deformities, performing personalized TKA can be more challenging and specific considerations are required, since one has to deal with an acquired pathological anatomy.
-
Performing personalized TKA surgery in patients with extra-articular deformities, the surgeon can: (1) resurface the joint, omitting the extra-articular deformity; (2) partially compensate the extra-articular deformity with intra-articular correction (hybrid technique), or (3) correct the extra-articular deformity combined with a joint resurfacing TKA (single stage or two-stage procedure).
-
Omitting the acquired lower limb malalignment by resurfacing the knee has the advantages of respecting the joint surface anatomy and preserving soft tissue laxities. On the other hand, it maintains pathological joint load and lower limb kinematics with potentially detrimental outcomes.
-
The hybrid technique can be performed in most cases. It circumvents complications associated with osteotomies and brings lower limb axes closer to native alignment. On the other hand, it creates some intra-articular imbalances, which may require soft tissue releases and/or constrained implants.
-
Correcting the extra-articular deformity (through an osteotomy) in conjunction with joint resurfacing TKA represents the only true kinematic alignment technique, as it aims to reproduce native knee laxity and overall lower limb axis.
Search for other papers by Felix Christoph Finger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Osteotomie Komitee der Deutschen Knie Gesellschaft (DKG), Munich, Germany
Search for other papers by Steffen Schröter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christoph Ihle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Moritz Herbst in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tina Histing in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Osteotomie Komitee der Deutschen Knie Gesellschaft (DKG), Munich, Germany
AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Marc-Daniel Ahrend in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
The present narrative review provides a summary of postoperative therapy modalities and their effectiveness following osteotomies around the knee.
-
The topics that are discussed in the scientific discourse include support of cartilage cell regeneration, pain management, drainage insertion, tourniquet use, pharmacological and mechanical thromboembolism prophylaxis, weight-bearing protocols and bone consolidation.
-
There is evidence for the use of pharmacological thromboembolism prophylaxis and weight-bearing protocols.
-
A standardized postoperative treatment concept following osteotomies around the knee cannot be derived due to lack of evidence for the other topics in current literature.
Search for other papers by Chengxin Xie in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Wenjun Pan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Shouli Wang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Xueli Yan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hua Luo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purpose
-
Knee arthroplasty is an effective treatment for severe knee degeneration; however, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is one of its serious complications. Single- and two-stage revision are common treatments, but few studies have compared single- and two-stage revision for PJI after knee arthroplasty. This study aimed to compare the reinfection and reoperation rates of single- and two-stage revision through meta-analysis.
Methods
-
The review process was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched the PubMed, Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for trials comparing single- and two-stage revision for PJI after knee arthroplasty from the respective inception dates to April 2023. Two researchers individually screened the studies, performed the literature quality evaluation and data extraction and used Stata 17 software for data analysis.
Results
-
The meta-analysis showed that the reinfection rate was significantly lower in the single-stage revision group than in the two-stage revision group. While the reoperation rates demonstrated no statistically significant difference between the two groups. We presented descriptive results because the discrepancies in the knee function scores and data reported in the studies meant that these data could not be combined in the meta-analysis.
Conclusion
-
Based on the available research, single-stage revision is a reliable option for PJI after knee arthroplasty. However, when developing the best treatment strategy, it is still necessary to consider the individual circumstances and needs of the patient, as well as the risks of postoperative rehabilitation and complications.
Search for other papers by Francesco Pirato in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Federica Rosso in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Federico Dettoni in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Davide Edoardo Bonasia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matteo Bruzzone in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Roberto Rossi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
Knee stiffness is a widely known and worrying condition in several postoperative knees. Less is known about native stiff knee. The aim of this manuscript is to summarize the available literature on native stiff knee epidemiology, classification and treatment.
-
In 1989 stiff knee was defined as a knee with less than 50° of total range of motion. If range of motion is <30°, it is defined as an ankylosed knee. Knee stiffness can be divided into three main types: flexion contractures, extension contractures, and combined contractures. Different risk factors have been associated to native stiff knee and grouped into modifiable or not modifiable. Furthermore, risk factors can be divided into patients’ related no patients’-related.
-
Different treatment modalities can be indicated to treat knee stiffness, including manipulation under anesthesia (MUA), arthroscopic and open surgical release. When stiffness is associated with articular disruption TKA represent an option. TKA in native stiff knee can be challenging for the surgeon. Implant’s choice and knee exposure are the first steps. In some cases, additional release and extensive can be considered. A stepwise approach and careful preoperative planning are mandatory to obtain long-term satisfactory outcomes.
-
Native stiff knee is a rare but invalidating condition. Different treatment modalities have been proposed as treatment. However, considering that it is frequently associated to sever arthritis, TKA can be an option in painful stiff knees. Nature of knee stiffness necessitates a customized approach to ensure successful management and achieve satisfying outcomes.
Search for other papers by Andrea Pratobevera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Luxembourg Institute of Research in Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine and Science (LIROMS), Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Luxembourg-Clinique d’Eich, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
Search for other papers by Romain Seil in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Orthopaedic Surgery Service, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Jacques Menetrey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
This review explores the intricate relationship between knee osteotomy and frontal plane joint line orientation, emphasizing the dynamic nature of the joint line’s influence on knee forces and kinematics.
-
Consideration of coronal alignments, knee phenotypes, and associated angles (medial proximal tibial angle (MTPA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA)) becomes crucial in surgical planning to avoid joint line deformities.
-
The double-level osteotomy is to be considered a valid option, especially for severe deformities; however, the target patient cannot be selected solely based on high predicted postoperative joint line obliquity (JLO) and MPTA.
Search for other papers by Laura Walthert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael Ris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kevin Moerenhout in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sébastien Déglise in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pietro Giovanni Di Summa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sylvain Steinmetz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
Major amputations of the lower extremity may be required after trauma and a variety of underlying diseases such as peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, and malignancies.
-
The goal of any major amputation is an optimal functional result with a maximum limb length in combination with optimal wound healing. The preservation of the knee joint is essential for successful rehabilitation, and this is best achieved by the Burgess below-knee amputation (BKA).
-
Whenever a BKA is not possible, the Gritti–Stokes amputation is our first choice.
-
This technique mainly consists of a through-knee amputation with the creation of a pedicled patella flap consisting of the patella, patellar ligament, and overlying soft tissue. After osteotomy of the distal femur and resection of the articular surface of the patella, the anterior flap is rotated in order to cover the femur defect while performing a patellofemoral arthrodesis.
-
The aim of this paper is to describe our surgical technique and experience with GSA and to point out the important steps of this procedure.
-
In conclusion, GSA is an excellent surgical option for patients requiring major lower limb amputations where BKA cannot be considered. Particular attention must be paid to careful preoperative evaluation and optimization of comorbidities. A meticulous surgical technique is warranted, including atraumatic tissue handling and an optimal patellofemoral arthrodesis technique.
