Browse
You are looking at 61 - 70 of 761 items for
Search for other papers by Laura Walthert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Michael Ris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kevin Moerenhout in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sébastien Déglise in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Pietro Giovanni Di Summa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sylvain Steinmetz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
Major amputations of the lower extremity may be required after trauma and a variety of underlying diseases such as peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, and malignancies.
-
The goal of any major amputation is an optimal functional result with a maximum limb length in combination with optimal wound healing. The preservation of the knee joint is essential for successful rehabilitation, and this is best achieved by the Burgess below-knee amputation (BKA).
-
Whenever a BKA is not possible, the Gritti–Stokes amputation is our first choice.
-
This technique mainly consists of a through-knee amputation with the creation of a pedicled patella flap consisting of the patella, patellar ligament, and overlying soft tissue. After osteotomy of the distal femur and resection of the articular surface of the patella, the anterior flap is rotated in order to cover the femur defect while performing a patellofemoral arthrodesis.
-
The aim of this paper is to describe our surgical technique and experience with GSA and to point out the important steps of this procedure.
-
In conclusion, GSA is an excellent surgical option for patients requiring major lower limb amputations where BKA cannot be considered. Particular attention must be paid to careful preoperative evaluation and optimization of comorbidities. A meticulous surgical technique is warranted, including atraumatic tissue handling and an optimal patellofemoral arthrodesis technique.
Search for other papers by Victor Housset in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sean Wei Loong Ho in
Google Scholar
PubMed
FORE (Foundation for Research and Teaching in Orthopedics, Sports Medicine, Trauma, and Imaging in the Musculoskeletal System), Meyrin, Switzerland
Division of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Alexandre Lädermann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sean Kean Ann Phua in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Si Jian Hui in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Geoffroy Nourissat in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purpose
-
A variety of instabilities are grouped under multidirectional instability (MDI) of the shoulder. This makes understanding its diagnostic process, presentation and treatment difficult due to lack of evidence-based consensus. This review aims to propose a novel classification for subtypes of MDI.
Methods
-
A systematic search was performed on PubMed Medline and Embase. A combination of the following 'MeSH' and 'non-MesH' search terms were used: (1) Glenohumeral joint[tiab] OR Glenohumeral[tiab] OR Shoulder[tiab] OR Shoulder joint[tiab] OR Shoulder[MeSH] OR Shoulder joint[MeSH], (2) Multidirectional[tiab], (3) Instability[tiab] OR Joint instability[MeSH]. Sixty-eight publications which met our criteria were included.
Results
-
There was a high degree of heterogeneity in the definition of MDI. Thirty-one studies (46%) included a trauma etiology in the definition, while 23 studies (34%) did not. Twenty-five studies (37%) excluded patients with labral or bony injuries. Only 15 (22%) studies defined MDI as a global instability (instability in all directions), while 28 (41%) studies considered MDI to be instability in two directions, of which one had to include the inferior direction. Six (9%) studies included the presence of global ligamentous laxity as part of the definition. To improve scientific accuracy, the authors propose a novel AB classification which considers traumatic etiology and the presence of hyperlaxity when subdividing MDI.
Conclusion
-
MDI is defined as symptomatic instability of the shoulder joint in two or more directions. A comprehensive classification system that considers predisposing trauma and the presence of hyperlaxity can provide a more precise assessment of the various existing subtypes of MDI.
Level of Evidence
-
III
Artro Institute, 8, rue du Pont de Thé, Annecy Le Vieux, France
Search for other papers by Tarik Ait-Si-Selmi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jean-Pierre Vidalain in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sonia Ramos-Pascual in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Thomas Kuratle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mo Saffarini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Edouard Dejour in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Artro Institute, 8, rue du Pont de Thé, Annecy Le Vieux, France
Search for other papers by Michel P Bonnin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purpose
-
to systematically review comparative studies reporting revision rates, clinical outcomes, or radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using collared versus collarless conventional-length uncemented hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated stems.
Methods
-
In adherence with PRISMA guidelines, a literature search was performed on Medline, Embase, and Scopus. Comparative clinical studies were eligible if they reported outcomes of collared versus collarless uncemented HA-coated stems for primary THA. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full-texts to determine eligibility; then performed data extraction; and assessed the quality of studies according to Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist.
Results
-
The search returned 972 records, 486 were duplicates, and 479 were excluded after title/abstract/full-text screening. Three further studies were included from the references of eligible studies and from discussions with subject matter experts, resulting in 11 included studies. The JBI checklist indicated six studies scored ≥7 points and four studies ≥4 points. Pooled data revealed collared stems had significantly lower revision rates (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.31–0.64) and subsidence (MD = −1 mm; 95% CI = −1.6–-0.3), but no significant difference in intraoperative complication rates (OR = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.67–1.32) in the short term to mid-term. Unpooled data indicated that collared stems provide equivalent survival, equivalent or better outcomes, and equivalent or lower complication rates.
Conclusion
-
In comparative studies, collared stems have lower revision rates than collarless stems, as well as equivalent or better clinical and radiographic outcomes. Differences could be due to a protective effect that the collar offers against subsidence, particularly in undersized or misaligned stems. Further studies are warranted to confirm long-term results and better understand differences between registry data and clinical studies.
Anatomy Institute and Orthopedics Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Search for other papers by Diogo Lino Moura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purpose
-
The aim of the study was to assess the role of kyphoplasty and expandable intravertebral implants in the treatment of traumatic vertebral compression fractures.
Design
-
This is a systematic review.
Methods
-
A bibliographic search was carried out in the PubMed/MEDLINE database according to PRISMA guidelines regarding kyphoplasty and expandable intravertebral implants in the treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures.
Results
-
A total of 611 records were screened. In total, 51 studies were obtained referring to traumatic vertebral fractures treated with kyphoplasty; however, of these, only studies addressing traumatic burst fractures were selected, resulting in 12 studies: 10 about kyphoplasty and 2 regarding armed kyphoplasty. In all studies, there was a statistically significant improvement in clinical and functional parameters, restoration of vertebral height and decreasing of vertebral and segmental kyphosis. Overall, there was only a residual loss of height and a slight increase in kyphosis throughout the follow-up period, while complications consisted essentially of cement leakage, all with no clinical repercussions.
Conclusion
-
After the discussion, where we address the concepts of direct and indirect reduction, the association of kyphoplasty with pedicle fixation, the potential advantages of expandable intravertebral implants, as well as the vertebral body type of filling in kyphoplasty, it is concluded that kyphoplasty demonstrates favorable outcomes as a method of posterior percutaneous transpedicular access for reconstruction of the anterior column in burst fractures. It allows for the reconstruction of the vertebral body closer to its original anatomy, carried out in a minimally invasive and safe way, which provides a clinical-functional and imaging improvement maintained at the medium–long term.
Institut du mouvement et de l’appareil locomoteur, Marseille, France
Search for other papers by Ahmed Mabrouk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jae-Sung An in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kristian Kley in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Komal Tapasvi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sachin Tapasvi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Matthieu Ollivier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
Varus knees with associated cartilage pathologies are not uncommon scenarios that present to orthopaedic surgeons.
-
There is no agreement on the ideal management of varus knees with concomitant cartilage pathology.
-
Through a literature review, the authors tried to answer three main questions:
-
On October 2022, OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and COCHRANE databases were searched. Clinical studies reporting on clinical, radiologic, or macroscopic cartilage regeneration following either isolated knee osteotomy or concomitant osteotomy and a cartilage procedure were reviewed.
-
Despite controversies, the literature demonstrated favourable outcomes of combined knee osteotomy and a cartilage procedure in patients with substantial deformity and cartilage defects.
-
Isolated high tibial osteotomy may induce cartilage regeneration in several scenarios and severities of concomitant malalignment and cartilage defects.
-
There are recommendations that knee osteotomy should be added to a cartilage procedure when an extra-articular deformity of > 5° is detected.
-
Some studies report good outcomes for combining a knee osteotomy with cartilage grafting, but they lack a control group of isolated osteotomy.
-
There is still scarce of evidence on the influence of osteotomies on cartilage regeneration and the outcomes of concomitant osteotomy and different cartilage procedures vs isolated osteotomies.
-
With advanced statistical evaluation (artificial intelligence, machine learning) of big datasets, more answers and better results will be delivered.
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
Fondazione Livio Sciutto Onlus, Campus Savona - Università degli Studi di Genova, Via Magliotto 2, Savona, Italy
Search for other papers by Mattia Loppini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
Search for other papers by Francesco Manlio Gambaro in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marco di Maio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Fondazione Livio Sciutto Onlus, Campus Savona - Università degli Studi di Genova, Via Magliotto 2, Savona, Italy
Search for other papers by Guido Grappiolo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
The number of primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and revisions is expected to steadily grow in the future. The femoral revision surgery can be technically demanding whether severe bone defects need to be addressed.
-
The femoral revision aims to obtain a proper primary stability of the stem with a more proximal fixation as possible. Several authors previously proposed classification systems to describe the morphology of the bony femoral defect and to drive accordingly the surgeon in the revision procedure.
-
The previous classifications mainly considered cortical and medullary bone at the level of the defect of poor quality by definition. Therefore, the surgical strategies aimed to achieve a distal fixation bypassing the defect or to fill the defect with bone impaction grafting or structured bone grafts up to the replacement of the proximal femur with megaprosthesis.
-
The consensus on a comprehensive and reliable classification system and management algorithm is still lacking. A new classification system should be developed taking into account the bone quality. The rationale of a new classification is that ‘functional’ residual bone stock could be present at the level of the defect. Therefore, it can be used to achieve a primary (mechanical) and secondary (biological) stability of the implants with a femoral fixation more proximal as possible.
Search for other papers by Yun Yang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Yin-xiao Peng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bin Yu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Aim
-
The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive overview of floating hip injury and attempt to provide a management algorithm.
Methods
-
PubMed was searched using the terms ‘Floating hip’ or ‘acetabular fracture’ and ‘Ipsilateral femoral fracture’ or ‘pelvic fracture’ and ‘Ipsilateral femoral fracture’. One author performed a preliminary review of the abstracts and references of the retrieved articles.
Results
-
The mean injury severe score reported was higher than 20. Chest and abdominal injuries, as well as fractures at other sites, were the most common associated injuries. Despite the high disability rate, surgery remained the preferred option for managing these injuries. The surgical timing varied from a few hours to several days and was subjected to the principles of damage control orthopedics. Although, in most cases, fixation of femoral fractures took precedence over pelvic or acetabular fractures, there was still a need to consider the impact of damage control orthopedics, associated injuries, and surgeon's considerations and preferences. Posttraumatic arthritis, neurological deficits, heterotopic ossification, femoral head necrosis, femoral nonunion, and limb inequality were common complications of the floating hip injury.
Conclusions
-
The severity of such injuries often exceeds that of an isolated injury and often requires specialized multidisciplinary treatment. In the management of these complex cases, the complexity and severity of the injury should be fully assessed, and an appropriate surgical plan should be developed to perform definitive surgery as early as possible, with attention to prevention of complications during the perioperative period.
Search for other papers by Andreas Frodl in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Johannes Hauss in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andreas Fuchs in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Markus Siegel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hagen Schmal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jan Kühle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Purpose
-
The fixation method of distal, extra-articular femur fractures is a controversially discussed. To ensure better stability itself, earlier mobilization and to prevent blood loss – all these are justifications for addressing the femur via reamed intramedullary nailing (RIMN). Anatomical reposition of multifragmentary fractures followed by increased risks of non-union are compelling reasons against it. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature for rates of non-union and wound infection, as well as blood loss and time of surgery.
Methods
-
According to the PRISMA guidelines we conducted this systematic review by searching the Cochrane, PubMed, Ovid, MedLine, and Embase databases. Inclusion criteria were the modified Coleman methodology score (mCMS) >60, age >18 years, and extra-articular fractures of the distal femur. Biomechanical and animal studies were excluded. By referring to title and abstract relevant articles were reviewed independently. In the consecutive meta-analysis, we compared 9 studies and 639 patients.
Results
-
There is no statistically significant difference comparing superficial wound infections when RIMN was performed (OR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.18 – 1.42; P = 0.19) as well as in deep wound infections (OR = 0.74; 95% CI: 0.19–2.81; P = 0.62). However, these results were not significant. We also calculated for potential differences in the rate of non-unions depending on the surgical treatment applied. Data of 556 patients revealed an overall number of 43 non-unions. There was no significant difference in rate of non-unions between both groups (OR = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.51–1.85; P = 0.92).
Conclusion
-
No statistical difference was found in our study among RIMN and plate fixation in the treatment of distal femoral fractures with regard to the incidence of non-union and wound infections. Therefore, the indication for RIMN or plating should be made individually and based on the surgeon’s experience.
Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Zentrum München (MUM), Marchionostraße, Munich, Germany
Justus Maximilian University Wuerzburg, König-Ludwig-Haus, Brettreichstraße, Würzburg, Germany
Paracelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität, Strubergasse, Salzburg, Austria
Working Group Clinical Tissue Regeneration of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (DGOU), Berlin, Germany
Search for other papers by Markus Walther in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Muskuloskelettales Zentrum München (MUM), Marchionostraße, Munich, Germany
Working Group Clinical Tissue Regeneration of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (DGOU), Berlin, Germany
Search for other papers by Oliver Gottschalk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), DOUW - Abteilung für Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Ernst-Grube-Straße, Halle, Germany
BG-Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Halle, Saale, Germany
Search for other papers by Matthias Aurich in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
The working group ‘Clinical Tissue Regeneration’ of the German Society of Orthopedics and Traumatology (DGOU) issues this paper with updating its guidelines.
-
Literature was analyzed regarding different topics relevant to osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) treatment. This process concluded with a statement for each topic reflecting the best scientific evidence available with a grade of recommendation. All group members rated the statements to identify possible gaps between literature and current clinical practice.
-
Fixation of a vital bony fragment should be considered in large fragments. In children with open physis, retrograde drilling seems to work better than in adults, but even there, the revision rate reaches 50%. The literature supports debridement with bone marrow stimulation (BMS) in lesions smaller than 1.0 cm² without bony defect. The additional use of a scaffold can be recommended in lesions larger than 1.0 cm². For other scaffolds besides AMIC®/Chondro-Gide®, there is only limited evidence. Systematic reviews report good to excellent clinical results in 87% of the patients after osteochondral transplantation (OCT), but donor site morbidity is of concern, reaching 16.9%. There is no evidence of any additional benefit from autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). Minced cartilage lacks any supporting data. Metallic resurfacing of OLT can only be recommended as a second-line treatment. A medial malleolar osteotomy has a minor effect on the clinical outcome compared to the many other factors influencing the clinical result.
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Chengxiang Li in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Center of the University of Basel (KWUB), Basel, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Fatime Krasniqi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Ricardo Donners in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Clarunis, University Digestive Health Care Center, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital Basel, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Christoph Kettelhack in
Google Scholar
PubMed
The Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Center of the University of Basel (KWUB), Basel, Switzerland
Search for other papers by Andreas H Krieg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
-
Synovial sarcoma is a rare and highly malignant soft tissue sarcoma. The inconspicuous and diversity of its early symptoms make it a highly misdiagnosed disease.
-
The management of synovial sarcomas is challenging as they are rare and have a poor prognosis. Early and correct diagnosis and treatment are critical for clinical outcomes. Misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis can have devastating consequences for the patient.
-
The detection of SS18 gene rearrangement is considered a powerful tool in establishing the diagnosis of synovial sarcomas. Biopsies and testing for gene rearrangements are recommended for all patients in whom SS cannot be excluded.
-
Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for synovial sarcomas. Neoadjuvant/adjuvant radiotherapy is recommended for patients with big tumors (>5 cm) or positive resection margins, and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for patients with high-risk tumors or advanced diseases.
-
This article reviews synovial sarcomas from the perspectives of clinical and radiological presentation, histological and cytogenetic analysis, differential diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.
