Browse

You are looking at 31 - 40 of 768 items for

Mara Meyer Günderoth Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Mara Meyer Günderoth in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alexandra Bannach-Brown Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, QUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Alexandra Bannach-Brown in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tobias Winkler Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin, Germany
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Tobias Winkler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Johannes Keller Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

Search for other papers by Johannes Keller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Robert Karl Zahn Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Robert Karl Zahn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Tazio Maleitzke Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Berlin, Germany
Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Julius Wolff Institute, Berlin, Germany
Trauma Orthopaedic Research Copenhagen Hvidovre (TORCH), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital – Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for other papers by Tazio Maleitzke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purpose

  • The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of calcitonin (CT) in animal models of experimental osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as new stabilized CT formulations are currently being introduced.

Methods

  • A comprehensive and systemic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases to identify articles with original data on CT treatment of preclinical OA and RA. Methodological quality was assessed using the Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation’s risk of bias tool for animal intervention studies. To provide summary estimates of efficacy, a meta-analysis was conducted for outcomes reported in four or more studies, using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were employed to correct for study specifics.

Results

  • Twenty-six studies were ultimately evaluated and data from 16 studies could be analyzed in the meta-analysis, which included the following outcomes: bone mineral density, bone volume, levels of cross-linked C-telopeptide of type I collagen, histopathological arthritis score, and mechanical allodynia. For all considered outcome parameters, CT-treated groups were significantly superior to control groups (P = 0.002; P = 0.01; P < 0.00001; P < 0.00001; P = 0.04). For most outcomes, effect sizes were significantly greater in OA than in RA (P ≤ 0.025). High in-between study heterogeneity was detected.

Conclusion

  • There is preclinical evidence for an antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antinociceptive, cartilage- and bone-protective effect of CT in RA and OA. Given these effects, CT presents a promising agent for the treatment of both diseases, although the potential seems to be greater in OA.

Open access
Hsiao-Yi Cheng Department of Primary Care Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Hsiao-Yi Cheng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Chun-Wei Liang School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Department of Primary Care Medicine, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Chun-Wei Liang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yu-Hao Lee Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Yu-Hao Lee in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Timporn Vitoonpong Department of Rehabilitation, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bankok, Thailand

Search for other papers by Timporn Vitoonpong in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Chun-De Liao Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Master’s Program in Long-Term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Chun-De Liao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Shih-Wei Huang Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan

Search for other papers by Shih-Wei Huang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purpose

  • The combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions is strongly recommended by current guidelines for knee osteoarthritis. However, few systematic reviews have validated their combined efficacy. In this study, we investigated the effects of the combination of pharmacological agents and exercise on knee osteoarthritis.

Methods

  • Randomized controlled trials that investigated the efficacy of pharmacological agents combined with exercise for knee osteoarthritis were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to February 2024. The network meta-analysis was performed within the frequentist framework. Standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI was estimated for pain and function. Grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluations were used to evaluate the certainty of evidence.

Results

  • In total, 71 studies were included. The combination therapy outperformed pharmacological or exercise therapy alone. Among the various pharmacological agents combined with exercise, mesenchymal stem cell injection was ranked the best for short-term pain reduction (SMD: −1.53, 95% CI: −1.92 to −1.13, high certainty), followed by botulinum toxin A, dextrose, and platelet-rich plasma. For long-term pain relief, dextrose prolotherapy was the optimal (SMD: −1.76, 95% CI: −2.65 to −0.88, moderate certainty), followed by mesenchymal stem cells, platelet rich in growth factor, and platelet-rich plasma.

Conclusion

  • Exercise programs should be incorporated into clinical practice and trial design. For patients undergoing exercise therapies, mesenchymal stem cell, dextrose, platelet-rich plasma, platelet rich in growth factor, and botulinum toxin A may be the optimal agents.

Open access
Peter Richard Almeida University of the Witwatersrand, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa

Search for other papers by Peter Richard Almeida in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Lipalo Mokete University of the Witwatersrand, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa

Search for other papers by Lipalo Mokete in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Nkhodiseni Sikhauli University of the Witwatersrand, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa

Search for other papers by Nkhodiseni Sikhauli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ahmad Mota University of the Witwatersrand, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa

Search for other papers by Ahmad Mota in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Bayanda Ndindwa University of the Witwatersrand, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa

Search for other papers by Bayanda Ndindwa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Jurek R T Pietrzak University of the Witwatersrand, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa

Search for other papers by Jurek R T Pietrzak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is rising globally, with an associated increase in associated complications, necessitating increased efforts in prevention of these complications with pre-operative optimisation.

  • Malnutrition has been highlighted as one of the most important pre-operative modifiable risk factors to be addressed in TJA, with the term malnutrition in orthopaedic surgery having a broad definition that encompasses a wide range of nutritional abnormalities from undernutrition to overnutrition contributing to the outcomes of TJA.

  • Complications associated with malnutrition include periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), periprosthetic fracture, dislocations, aseptic loosening, anaemia, prolonged length of stay (LOS), increased mortality, and raised health care costs.

  • Standardised nutritional scoring tools, anthropometric measurements, and serological markers are all options available in pre-operative nutritional assessment in TJA, but there is no consensus yet regarding the standardisation of what parameters to assess and how to assess them.

  • Abnormal parameters identified using any of the assessment methods results in the diagnosis of malnutrition, and correction of these parameters of overnutrition or undernutrition have shown to improve outcomes in TJA.

  • With the multiple nutritional parameters contributing to the success of total joint arthroplasty, it is imperative that orthopaedic surgeon has a thorough knowledge regarding nutritional peri-operative optimisation in TJA.

Open access
Carsten Perka Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité Medical University Center, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Carsten Perka in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Maziar Mohaddes Hässleholms Hospital, Region Skåne, Hässleholm, Sweden
Orthopedics, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

Search for other papers by Maziar Mohaddes in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Luigi Zagra Hip Department, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Luigi Zagra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Axel Ekkernkamp BG Klinikum Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin gGmbH, Berlin, Germany
BG Kliniken – Klinikverbund der gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung gGmbH, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Axel Ekkernkamp in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Niklas Keller Harding Center for Risk Literacy, University of Potsdam, Faculty of Health Sciences, Potsdam, Germany

Search for other papers by Niklas Keller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Dirk Stengel BG Kliniken – Klinikverbund der gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung gGmbH, Berlin, Germany

Search for other papers by Dirk Stengel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purpose

  • To assess utility, benefits, and risks of 4th-generation alumina–zirconia ceramic pairings in elective total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

  • A comprehensive mixed-methods best-evidence synthesis using data from systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies, as well as joint replacement registries, was conducted to estimate overall revision and survival rates, periprosthetic infection, bearing fractures, and noise phenomena with 4th-generation alumina–zirconia ceramic versus other tribological couplings in elective THA. The systematic review part across multiple databases was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023418076), and individual study data were extracted for statistical re-analysis.

Results

  • Twenty overlapping systematic reviews, 7, 17, and 8 references from RCTs, cohort studies, and joint replacement registries form the basis of this work. According to current best evidence, it is (i) 15–33 times more likely that 4th-generation alumina–zirconia pairings avoid a revision for infection than causing a revision for audible noise, (ii) 38–85 times more likely that 4th-generation alumina–zirconia pairings avoid a revision for infection than causing a revision for ceramic head fractures, and (iii) three to six times more likely that 4th-generation alumina–zirconia pairings avoid a revision for infection than cause a revision for ceramic liner fractures.

Conclusion

  • Fourth-generation alumina–zirconia pairings in THA show a favorable benefit–risk ratio, with rare compound-specific adverse events and complications significantly outbalanced by long-term advantages, such as a markedly lower incidence of revision for infection.

Open access
Gautier Beckers Department of Surgery, Hospital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for other papers by Gautier Beckers in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Marc-Olivier Kiss Department of Surgery, Hospital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Clinique Orthopédique Duval, Laval, Quebec, Canada

Search for other papers by Marc-Olivier Kiss in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Vincent Massé Department of Surgery, Hospital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Clinique Orthopédique Duval, Laval, Quebec, Canada

Search for other papers by Vincent Massé in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Michele Malavolta Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Department of Knee Surgery, Casa di Cura Solatrix, Rovereto, TN, Italy

Search for other papers by Michele Malavolta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Pascal-André Vendittoli Department of Surgery, Hospital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Personalized Arthroplasty Society, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Clinique Orthopédique Duval, Laval, Quebec, Canada

Search for other papers by Pascal-André Vendittoli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Over the years, with a better understanding of knee anatomy and biomechanics, superior implant designs, advanced surgical techniques, and the availability of precision tools such as robotics and navigation, a more personalized approach to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has emerged.

  • In the presence of extra-articular deformities, performing personalized TKA can be more challenging and specific considerations are required, since one has to deal with an acquired pathological anatomy.

  • Performing personalized TKA surgery in patients with extra-articular deformities, the surgeon can: (1) resurface the joint, omitting the extra-articular deformity; (2) partially compensate the extra-articular deformity with intra-articular correction (hybrid technique), or (3) correct the extra-articular deformity combined with a joint resurfacing TKA (single stage or two-stage procedure).

  • Omitting the acquired lower limb malalignment by resurfacing the knee has the advantages of respecting the joint surface anatomy and preserving soft tissue laxities. On the other hand, it maintains pathological joint load and lower limb kinematics with potentially detrimental outcomes.

  • The hybrid technique can be performed in most cases. It circumvents complications associated with osteotomies and brings lower limb axes closer to native alignment. On the other hand, it creates some intra-articular imbalances, which may require soft tissue releases and/or constrained implants.

  • Correcting the extra-articular deformity (through an osteotomy) in conjunction with joint resurfacing TKA represents the only true kinematic alignment technique, as it aims to reproduce native knee laxity and overall lower limb axis.

Open access
Felix Christoph Finger BG Klinik Tübingen, Department of Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

Search for other papers by Felix Christoph Finger in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Steffen Schröter Diakonie Klinikum Jung-Stilling GmbH, Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Siegen, Germany
Osteotomie Komitee der Deutschen Knie Gesellschaft (DKG), Munich, Germany

Search for other papers by Steffen Schröter in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Christoph Ihle BG Klinik Tübingen, Department of Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

Search for other papers by Christoph Ihle in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Moritz Herbst BG Klinik Tübingen, Department of Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

Search for other papers by Moritz Herbst in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tina Histing BG Klinik Tübingen, Department of Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

Search for other papers by Tina Histing in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Marc-Daniel Ahrend BG Klinik Tübingen, Department of Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
Osteotomie Komitee der Deutschen Knie Gesellschaft (DKG), Munich, Germany
AO Research Institute Davos, Davos, Switzerland

Search for other papers by Marc-Daniel Ahrend in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • The present narrative review provides a summary of postoperative therapy modalities and their effectiveness following osteotomies around the knee.

  • The topics that are discussed in the scientific discourse include support of cartilage cell regeneration, pain management, drainage insertion, tourniquet use, pharmacological and mechanical thromboembolism prophylaxis, weight-bearing protocols and bone consolidation.

  • There is evidence for the use of pharmacological thromboembolism prophylaxis and weight-bearing protocols.

  • A standardized postoperative treatment concept following osteotomies around the knee cannot be derived due to lack of evidence for the other topics in current literature.

Open access
Bowen Lai Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Bowen Lai in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Heng Jiang Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Heng Jiang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yuan Gao Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Yuan Gao in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Xuhui Zhou Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China

Search for other papers by Xuhui Zhou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Myositis ossificans (MO) is characterized by benign heterotopic ossificans in soft tissues like muscles, which can be classified into nonhereditary MO and fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP). Although MO has been studied for decades, no research reviewed and analyzed the features of publications in this field quantitatively and qualitatively.

  • Using bibliometrics tools (bibliometrix R package, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace), we conducted a bibliometric analysis of 1280 articles regarding MO in the Web of Science Core Collection database from 1993 to 2022.

  • The annual number of publications and related research areas in the MO field increased gradually in the past 20 years. The USA contributed the most percentage (42.58%) of articles. The University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) and the Journal Bone published the most articles among all institutions and journals. Kaplan FS and Shore EM from UPenn were the top two scholars who made the largest contributions to this field.

  • Keyword analysis showed that research hotspots changed from traumatic MO and clinical management of MO to the genetic etiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of FOP.

  • This study can provide new insights into the research trends of MO and helps researchers grasp and determine future study directions more easily.

Open access
Arvin Eslami Bone and Joint reconstruction research center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Firoozgar Hospital, Bone and Joint reconstruction research center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Orthopedic, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Search for other papers by Arvin Eslami in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mohammadreza Chehrassan Bone and Joint reconstruction research center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Orthopedic, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Search for other papers by Mohammadreza Chehrassan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Shaya Alimoghadam Bone and Joint reconstruction research center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Firoozgar Hospital, Bone and Joint reconstruction research center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Orthopedic, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Search for other papers by Shaya Alimoghadam in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Karim Pisoudeh Bone and Joint reconstruction research center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Firoozgar Hospital, Bone and Joint reconstruction research center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Orthopedic, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Search for other papers by Karim Pisoudeh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Amir Kasaeian Digestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute; Research Center for Chronic Inflammatory Diseases; Clinical Research Development Unit, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Search for other papers by Amir Kasaeian in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Omid Elahifar Bone and Joint reconstruction research center, Shafa Orthopedic Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Firoozgar Hospital, Bone and Joint reconstruction research center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Orthopedic, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Search for other papers by Omid Elahifar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purpose

  • This systematic review aims to investigate the management and outcomes of pelvic ring fractures (PRFs) during pregnancy, emphasizing maternal and fetal mortality rates, mechanisms of injury, and treatment modalities.

Methods

  • Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of databases from 2000 to 2023. This search identified 15 relevant studies involving a total of 33 patients. Data extraction included demographics, fracture types, treatment methods, and outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI criteria.

Results

  • Maternal mortality stood at 9.1%, with fetal mortality at 42.4%. Maternal factors impacting mortality included head trauma and hemodynamic instability. Fetal mortality correlated with mechanisms like motor vehicle accidents and maternal vital signs. Surgical and conservative treatments were applied, with a majority of pelvic surgeries performed before delivery. External fixators proved effective in fracture stabilization.

Conclusion

  • Pelvic ring fractures during pregnancy present significant risks to maternal and fetal health. Early stabilization and vigilant monitoring of maternal vital signs are crucial. Vaginal bleeding/discharge serves as a critical fetal risk indicator. The choice between surgical and conservative treatment minimally influenced outcomes. Multidisciplinary collaboration and tailored interventions are essential in managing these complex cases.

Open access
Juan Manuel Henríquez-Jurado Department of Health Sciences. University of Jaén. Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, Jaén, Spain

Search for other papers by Juan Manuel Henríquez-Jurado in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
María Catalina Osuna-Pérez Department of Health Sciences. University of Jaén. Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, Jaén, Spain

Search for other papers by María Catalina Osuna-Pérez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Héctor García-López Department of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Medicine. University of Almería. Ctra Sacrament s/n, Almería, Spain

Search for other papers by Héctor García-López in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rafael Lomas-Vega Department of Health Sciences. University of Jaén. Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, Jaén, Spain

Search for other papers by Rafael Lomas-Vega in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
María del Carmen López-Ruiz Department of Health Sciences. University of Jaén. Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, Jaén, Spain

Search for other papers by María del Carmen López-Ruiz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Esteban Obrero-Gaitán Department of Health Sciences. University of Jaén. Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, Jaén, Spain

Search for other papers by Esteban Obrero-Gaitán in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Irene Cortés-Pérez Department of Health Sciences. University of Jaén. Campus Las Lagunillas s/n, Jaén, Spain

Search for other papers by Irene Cortés-Pérez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Purpose

  • To compile all the scientific evidence available to date to evaluate the effect of virtual reality based therapy (VRBT) on reducing pain intensity, kinesiophobia, and associated disability, and on increasing the hr-QoL in patients with chronic neck pain (CNP) or chronic low back pain (CLBP).

Methods

  • Studies published in PubMed Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) up to June 2023 were searched. All searches followed the PICOS Framework. Two authors independently screened the studies found in the searches. Any differences of opinion regarding the selection of studies were settled by a third author.

Results

  • Twenty-five RCTs, published between 2013 and 2022, providing data from 1261 patients (20 RCTs) with CLBP and 261 patients (five RCTs) with CNP, were included. In reducing pain intensity for patients with CLBP, meta-analyses showed that VRBT is effective in reducing pain just to the end of the intervention, and this effect could be maintained 1 and 6 months after the therapy.

Conclusion

  • VRBT was found to be better than therapeutic exercise (TE), sham, and no intervention (NI), showing a major effect when VRBT was used as a complementary therapy to conventional physiotherapy (CPT). Further, VRBT showed an immediate effect and immersive VRBT was the most adequate VRBT modality in reducing pain in CNP patients. No differences were found between non-immersive VRBT and immersive VRBT in reducing pain, kinesiophobia, disability, and hr-QoL in patients with CLBP.

Open access
Hubert Laprus St Luke’s Hospital, Bielsko-Biala, Poland
Dworska Hospital, Kraków, Poland
Hospital in Proszowice, Poland

Search for other papers by Hubert Laprus in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Bartłomiej Juszczak University Children’s Hospital in Kraków, Poland

Search for other papers by Bartłomiej Juszczak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Roman Brzóska St Luke’s Hospital, Bielsko-Biala, Poland

Search for other papers by Roman Brzóska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Adrian Błasiak St Luke’s Hospital, Bielsko-Biala, Poland

Search for other papers by Adrian Błasiak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ion-Andrei Popescu Romanian Shoulder Institute -ORTOPEDICUM, Bucharest, Romania

Search for other papers by Ion-Andrei Popescu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Przemysław Lubiatowski Rehasport Clinic, Poznań, Poland

Search for other papers by Przemysław Lubiatowski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

  • Rotator cuff tears (RCT) and instability are the most common surgically treated shoulder pathologies.

  • The concept of augmentation using the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) autograft was created to improve the results of surgical treatment of these pathologies, especially in cases of chronic and massive injuries.

  • The popularity of using the LHBT for augmentation is evidenced by the significant number of publications on this topic published in the last 3 years; however, only one systematic review has been published regarding only LHBT augmentation for massive RCTs.

  • Several studies comparing partial repair with partial repair and additional LHBT augmentation for RCT showed superior clinical outcomes and lower re-tear rates when LHBT augmentation was performed.

  • There is a rising popularity of using LHBT as an autograft to perform superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) in case of irreparable rotator cuff tears.

  • In recent years, shoulder stabilization by arthroscopic Bankart repair with biceps augmentation has been promoted with very promising short-term results.

  • The evidence provided by studies appears to be sufficient to recommend the use of LHBT for augmentation whenever necessary; however, larger studies with long-term follow-up are needed.

Open access